Seavey v. State
57 So. 3d 978
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2011Background
- Seavey was convicted by a jury of aggravated battery of a pregnant person and false imprisonment.
- Direct appeal was affirmed per curiam by this court.
- Seavey timely filed a postconviction motion under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850.
- Grounds alleged: ineffective assistance for failures related to investigation, Frye hearing, judgment of acquittal, jury instructions, and quashing a count.
- The trial court granted an evidentiary hearing on ground one but summarily denied grounds two, three, and five.
- The appellate court affirmed grounds two, three, and five, reversed ground one for a new hearing, and reversed ground four with remand.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Counsel at evidentiary hearing | Seavey lacked counsel at the first hearing; he needed representation. | No clear right to appointed counsel at that stage; claims were insufficient. | Remanded to appoint postconviction counsel for ground one. |
| Incomplete false imprisonment instruction | Trial instruction omitted 'forcibly, secretly, or by threat' element. | Instruction otherwise adequate or not material to verdict. | Remanded; require records to refute or hold evidentiary hearing on ground four. |
| Other grounds (2, 3, 5) sufficiency | Ineffective assistance claims merit discussion and could affect outcome. | Claims lack merit or were properly denied. | Affirmed summary denial of grounds 2, 3, and 5. |
| Ground one on remand | Ground one merits a new evidentiary hearing. | Proceedings already concluded; no further hearing needed. | Ground one reversed; remanded for new evidentiary hearing with counsel. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Delva, 575 So. 2d 643 (Fla.1991) (complete jury instruction required; material to verdict)
- Williams v. State, 472 So. 2d 738 (Fla.1985) (need for counsel at hearings in certain postconviction contexts)
- Graham v. State, 372 So. 2d 1363 (Fla.1979) (standards for appointment of postconviction counsel)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1967) (Anders procedure for Anders-type appeals)
