History
  • No items yet
midpage
724 S.E.2d 715
Va.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Seabolt sued Albemarle County for injuries from allegedly gross negligence in maintaining a public park.
  • The county demurred to gross negligence and asserted sovereign immunity; the circuit court sustained the demurrer for gross negligence and did not rule on sovereign immunity.
  • On appeal, Seabolt argues the circuit court erred in sustaining the demurrer; the county argues lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to immunity and, arguably, presentment procedures.
  • Virginia law provides counties share common-law sovereign immunity from tort suits unless waived by statute.
  • The Virginia Tort Claims Act waives immunity for the Commonwealth but expressly excludes counties.
  • Code § 15.2-1809 creates park-gross-negligence liability for cities/towns and states counties have immunity in addition to existing immunity; it does not waive county immunity.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does § 15.2-1809 waive county immunity for gross negligence in park maintenance? Seabolt relies on § 15.2-1809 to permit county liability for gross negligence. § 15.2-1809 covers cities/towns and does not abrogate counties' immunity. No waiver; counties remain immune.
Does the VTCA apply to counties to waive immunity for tort claims against them? VTCA provides limited waiver for tort claims; counts may be asserted. VTCA does not apply to counties; immunity remains. VTCA does not abrogate county immunity.
Did the circuit court have subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudicate Seabolt's tort claim? Circuit court had jurisdiction over the claim despite immunity. Lacked jurisdiction due to sovereign immunity and procedural constraints. Circuit court lacked jurisdiction; dismissal affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Afzall v. Commonwealth, 273 Va. 226 (2007) (sovereign immunity; waiver must be explicit)
  • Doud v. Commonwealth, 282 Va. 317 (2011) ( VTCA; counties excluded from waiver)
  • Mann v. County Bd. of Arlington County, 199 Va. 169 (1957) (counties immune in tort; contract-based remedies only)
  • Fry v. County of Albemarle, 86 Va. 195 (1889) (no remedy against counties for negligence; contract focus)
  • Frazier v. City of Norfolk, 234 Va. 388 (1987) (counties’ immunity not abrogated; municipalities limited for gross/wanton negligence)
  • Addison v. Jurgelsky, 281 Va. 205 (2011) (statutory language; waiver must be explicit)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Seabolt v. County of Albemarle
Court Name: Supreme Court of Virginia
Date Published: Apr 20, 2012
Citations: 724 S.E.2d 715; 2012 Va. LEXIS 88; 283 Va. 717; 2012 WL 1377090; 110733
Docket Number: 110733
Court Abbreviation: Va.
Log In