midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2017 WL 2303512
E.D.N.Y.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Priscilla Properties applied (Feb 2010) for commercial general liability insurance from Scottsdale, representing its business as "interior residential carpentry" and indicating no general contracting, new-home construction, or exterior work; it affirmed those answers.
  • Scottsdale issued Policy No. CPS1149753 (2/27/2010–2/27/2011) under its New York Artisan Program and calculated premiums based on interior carpentry risk.
  • A state suit (Suffolk Action) arose from a 10/26/2010 accident: Neil Belanger fell while working on a project at the Graham Property; Priscilla tendered defense to Scottsdale under the Policy.
  • Depositions revealed that Priscilla actually acted as general contractor/construction manager, performed new-home and exterior work, retained subcontractors, and did not use written hold-harmless contracts—contradicting the application.
  • Scottsdale sent notice (6/9/2015) alleging material misrepresentations, returned premiums, and sued (8/14/2015) for declaratory relief and rescission; Scottsdale sought summary judgment as to the Belanger plaintiffs and default judgment as to nonappearing Priscilla and Pine.
  • The district court granted summary judgment and default judgment, concluding the Policy was procured by material misrepresentations and is void ab initio; Scottsdale’s obligations under the Policy were extinguished.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Priscilla made actionable misrepresentations in its insurance application Priscilla misrepresented nature/scope of operations (interior carpentry only), lack of GC role, and use of written contracts; answers induced issuance Belanger defendants did not meaningfully dispute facts; nonappearing defendants made no defense Court: Misrepresentations proven and admitted by default; actionable under NY law
Whether those misrepresentations were material Scottsdale: underwriting guidelines show Artisan Program excludes GCs/new-home builders; Scottsdale would not have issued or would have issued on different terms Belanger: argued declaratory relief premature due to unresolved state liability (jurisdictional challenge) Court: Misrepresentations material; Scottsdale would not have issued policy as written; declaratory relief ripe because defense was tendered (live coverage dispute)
Whether federal court has jurisdiction to decide rescission while state liability unresolved Scottsdale: coverage dispute is ripe once insurer is tendered defense; an actual controversy exists Belanger: declaratory judgment premature pending state-court determination of liability Court: Jurisdiction proper; substantial, immediate controversy exists given Scottsdale’s defense with reservation of rights
Whether default judgment warranted against nonappearing defendants Scottsdale: served process, defendants failed to appear; default judgment proper and complaint states viable claim Priscilla/Pine: no appearance or opposition Court: Entry of default and default judgment granted; complaint states claim entitling relief

Key Cases Cited

  • Republic Ins. Co. v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 77 F.3d 48 (2d Cir.) (rescission permitted for material misrepresentations)
  • Vella v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc., 887 F.2d 388 (2d Cir. 1989) (insurer must prove misrepresentation and materiality; innocent misstatement may still void policy)
  • Christiania Gen. Ins. Corp. v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 979 F.2d 268 (2d Cir. 1992) (materiality assessed at time of contracting; underwriting practices relevant)
  • Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. JMR Elecs. Corp., 848 F.2d 80 (2d Cir. 1988) (focus on whether insurer was induced to issue the particular policy it did)
  • Au Bon Pain Corp. v. Artect, Inc., 653 F.2d 61 (2d Cir. 1981) (upon default, well-pleaded allegations are accepted as true but court must still determine legal sufficiency)
  • City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC, 645 F.3d 114 (2d Cir. 2011) (two-step Rule 55 procedure: entry of default then default judgment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Priscilla Properties, LLC
Court Name: District Court, E.D. New York
Date Published: May 24, 2017
Citations: 2017 WL 2303512; 254 F. Supp. 3d 476; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80475; 15-cv-4764(ADS)(AYS)
Docket Number: 15-cv-4764(ADS)(AYS)
Court Abbreviation: E.D.N.Y.
Log In
    Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Priscilla Properties, LLC, 2017 WL 2303512