History
  • No items yet
midpage
125 So. 3d 932
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant sought post-conviction relief via a second pro se motion under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which was summary denied.
  • Appellant was convicted in two cases after a plea; one case and the most serious charge in the other were dismissed; he pled guilty to two counts of lewd or lascivious molestation and one count of lewd or lascivious exhibition.
  • Sentence imposed: ten years’ prison and twenty years’ sex offender probation on one count, with concurrent twenty and fifteen-year terms on the remaining counts.
  • A probation condition barred internet access until a risk assessment was completed, reflecting language from 948.30(l)(h) Florida Statutes (2005) and applying to offenses occurring after July 1, 2005.
  • The offenses underlying the plea occurred between July 2004 and August 2005; appellant did not file a direct appeal after sentencing.
  • The 2012 motion alleged newly discovered evidence via probation orders (January 2, 2007) restricting internet access and claimed mutual mistake based on counsel’s alleged assurances; the motion argued the evidence post-dates final judgments but falls outside the two-year deadline.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the 3.850 motion was timely under the two-year limit Appellant State Untimely; Parks rule applies
Whether the 3.850(b)(1) newly discovered-evidence exception can salvage untimeliness Appellant State Not satisfied; evidence not newly discovered or probable acquittal

Key Cases Cited

  • Parks v. State, 101 So.3d 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (two-year time limit; exception requires newly discovered evidence)
  • State v. Corner, 84 So.3d 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (3.850(b)(1) exception telegraphed)
  • Jones v. State, 709 So.2d 512 (Fla. 1998) (newly discovered evidence standard)
  • Wainwright v. State, 983 So.2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (plea-era fact not newly discovered)
  • Foss v. State, 24 So.3d 1275 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (scoresheet error not newly discovered for 3.850(b) exception)
  • Dwyer v. State, 981 So.2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (conditional release not a new fact)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Schultheis v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 22, 2013
Citations: 125 So. 3d 932; 2013 WL 2218106; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8133; No. 4D12-2285
Docket Number: No. 4D12-2285
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In
    Schultheis v. State, 125 So. 3d 932