midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
251 P.3d 666
Kan. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Liberty Asset Management purchased the redemption rights to 222 South Greenwood in Wichita and later rehabilitated the property.
  • Daniel Drake, Liberty’s managing member, hired Darren Boldea to market the property; Boldea prepared the MLS listing that stated the roof was new.
  • Drake did not discuss MLS contents with Boldea and did not see the MLS statement; Schneider’s agent noticed it and Schneider became interested by price and features listed as new.
  • Schneider signed an offer April 16, 2007; an inspection on April 24, 2007 showed roof information in the report but Schneider did not request roof repairs.
  • The purchase contract contained broad waivers and disclaimers, including that buyers rely on their own judgment and that the contract constitutes the entire agreement; Schneider did not waive KCPA rights in writing.
  • The roof leaked months after purchase; communications in July 2007 between Schneider and related agents questioned the roof’s status and whether it was truly new.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Waiver of KCPA claims through contract Schneider did not validly waive KCPA rights. Contract language could foreclose KCPA claims if construed as a waiver. Waiver not proven; contract did not explicitly waive KCPA rights.
Whether MLS listing stating 'new roof' was a deceptive act under KCPA Listing labeling roof as new when not new constitutes deception under KCPA. No willful deception required for KCPA violation; must show misleading representation. There was substantial evidence of a deceptive act under KCPA §50-626(b)(1)(C).
Whether Schneider is an aggrieved party under KCPA Schneider was aggrieved due to misrepresentation affecting her purchase. Schneider cannot prove harm causally linked to the misrepresentation; she relied on inspection and other factors. Schneider was not an aggrieved party; judgment reversed insofar as it awarded damages.

Key Cases Cited

  • Conner v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co., 281 Kan. 875 (2006) (court reviews legal effect of contract terms de novo)
  • Crandall v. Grbic, 36 Kan. App. 2d 179 (2006) (no KCPA violation where seller did not misrepresent roof condition)
  • Stechschulte v. Jennings, 43 Kan. App. 2d 47 (2010) (realtor liability under KCPA requires willful or wanton failure to disclose material facts)
  • Finstad v. Washburn University, 252 Kan. 465 (1993) (aggrieved party requirement and causation considerations under KCPA)
  • Alexander v. Certified Master Builders Corp., 268 Kan. 812 (2000) (aggrieved party analysis; damages not strictly pecuniary)
  • Cornerstone Homes v. Skinner, 44 Kan. App. 2d 88 (2010) (KCPA deception elements and written representations considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Schneider v. Liberty Asset Management
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date Published: May 27, 2011
Citations: 251 P.3d 666; 2011 Kan. App. LEXIS 88; 45 Kan. App. 2d 978; 104,361
Docket Number: 104,361
Court Abbreviation: Kan. Ct. App.
Log In
    Schneider v. Liberty Asset Management, 251 P.3d 666