Schmidt v. University of Northwestern-St Paul
0:23-cv-02199
D. MinnesotaJun 5, 2025Background
- Rolanda Schmidt, a former Assistant Professor of Business and Program Manager at the University of Northwestern-St. Paul (a private Christian university), sued the University for employment discrimination and retaliation based on race and gender under Title VII and negligent supervision under state law.
- Schmidt alleges she experienced workplace discrimination, harassment (including hate crimes), and retaliation, claiming the University failed to address these issues before ultimately terminating her employment.
- All faculty at the University, regardless of discipline, are expected to integrate Christianity into teaching and are viewed as “ministers” tasked with both intellectual and spiritual growth of students.
- The University moved for summary judgment, arguing the “ministerial exception” under the First Amendment bars the court from hearing Schmidt’s claims involving employment discrimination against religious institutions by “ministers.”
- Discovery was bifurcated to first determine whether the ministerial exception applies before full discovery on other issues; the case is at the summary judgment stage focusing on this threshold question.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is University a religious institution? | University not a religious institution (recently) | University is a religious institution | Yes; school’s Christian mission qualifies it as religious under precedent |
| Is Schmidt a "minister" for the exception? | Schmidt not a minister, only taught secular classes | Schmidt acted as minister by integrating faith into teaching | Yes; faculty held out as ministers, expected to integrate faith, so exception applies |
| Does ministerial exception bar Title VII? | Exception should not apply to her Title VII claim | Ministerial exception bars court from hearing Title VII | Yes; exception bars interference in Title VII employment claim |
| Does ministerial exception bar negligent supervision? | Not fully briefed; claim should proceed | Exception may bar claim if ecclesiastical matters implicated | Unclear; summary judgment denied without prejudice, further briefing/discovery needed |
Key Cases Cited
- Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & Sch. v. E.E.O.C., 565 U.S. 171 (2012) (establishes the ministerial exception to employment discrimination suits against religious institutions)
- Our Lady of Guadalupe Sch. v. Morrissey-Berru, 591 U.S. 732 (2020) (further expands ministerial exception to teachers entrusted with educating in the faith)
- Starkey v. Roman Cath. Archdiocese of Indianapolis, Inc., 41 F.4th 931 (7th Cir. 2022) (applies ministerial exception to a Catholic high school guidance counselor)
- Billard v. Charlotte Cath. High Sch., 101 F.4th 316 (4th Cir. 2024) (applies ministerial exception to an English and drama teacher at a Catholic high school)
- Conlon v. InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, 777 F.3d 829 (6th Cir. 2015) (ministerial exception applies to non-denominational Christian organizations)
