History
  • No items yet
midpage
814 F.3d 1151
10th Cir.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Schaffer was ticketed by Salt Lake City parking enforcement officers Hollingshead and Cameron after parking in a no-parking zone; an on-scene dispute with another motorist occurred.
  • As Schaffer drove away, officers yelled and pounded the truck; Cameron (on dispatch line) and Hollingshead later reported that Schaffer had hit them and the City vehicle and that the side mirror was broken.
  • Officer Stumm, responding to the officers’ report, later located Schaffer’s truck at her home, observed marks consistent with the officers’ statements, and arrested and booked Schaffer for aggravated assault and criminal mischief.
  • Schaffer was acquitted at trial and then sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for malicious prosecution against the parking officers and the City (and originally Stumm, though she abandoned that appeal).
  • District court granted summary judgment for defendants; the Tenth Circuit considered only whether the parking officers acted under color of state law (a prerequisite for § 1983 liability) and affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether officers acted under color of state law when reporting and testifying Schaffer: officers used their official status and were on duty, so their false statements were state action Officers/City: giving witness statements and reporting incidents is a private act; no use of statutory authority or state power in reporting/testimony Court: No — officers did not act under color of state law when reporting or testifying; they acted as private citizens
Whether officers were joint actors with police (concerted action) Schaffer: officers’ reports and statements effectively prompted and aided prosecution, showing joint action with police Defendants: merely furnishing information to police, and Stumm conducted an independent investigation before arresting Schaffer Court: No — furnishing information alone is insufficient; no evidence of shared unconstitutional goal or that police substituted private judgment for their own
Municipal liability for officers’ conduct Schaffer: City liable under Monell via officers’ conduct and resulting prosecution City: municipal liability requires an underlying constitutional violation by state actors; here officers did not act under color of law Court: No municipal liability because officers did not commit state-action; thus no § 1983 claim against City
Sufficiency of evidence to defeat summary judgment on state-action/joint-action Schaffer: factual disputes (e.g., whether truck struck officers) preclude summary judgment Defendants: undisputed record shows only reports and statements; Stumm’s independent steps (photos, locating truck, marks) broke causal link Court: Summary judgment affirmed — even viewing facts for plaintiff, legal standard for color of state law/joint action not met

Key Cases Cited

  • Twigg v. Hawker Beechcraft Corp., 659 F.3d 987 (10th Cir. 2011) (summary judgment standard and de novo review)
  • D.T. ex rel. M.T. v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16, 894 F.2d 1176 (10th Cir. 1990) (elements of § 1983 and color-of-state-law discussion)
  • Haines v. Fisher, 82 F.3d 1503 (10th Cir. 1996) (badge-of-authority test for acting under color of state law)
  • West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988) (defining color of state law as exercise of power by virtue of state authority)
  • Jojola v. Chavez, 55 F.3d 488 (10th Cir. 1995) (no state action where private conduct lacked nexus to official authority)
  • Gallagher v. Neil Young Freedom Concert, 49 F.3d 1442 (10th Cir. 1995) (joint-action/concerted-action framework)
  • Benavidez v. Gunnell, 722 F.2d 615 (10th Cir. 1983) (mere furnishing of information to police does not create joint action)
  • Carey v. Continental Airlines, 823 F.2d 1402 (10th Cir. 1987) (private complaint to police does not show substitution of police judgment absent evidence)
  • Lee v. Town of Estes Park, Colo., 820 F.2d 1112 (10th Cir. 1987) (property owner’s complaint did not amount to joint action where officer independently decided to charge)
  • Hinton v. City of Elwood, 997 F.2d 774 (10th Cir. 1993) (municipal liability requires an underlying constitutional violation by officers)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Schaffer v. Salt Lake City Corporation
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 2, 2016
Citations: 814 F.3d 1151; 2016 WL 805857; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3846; 14-4112
Docket Number: 14-4112
Court Abbreviation: 10th Cir.
Log In
    Schaffer v. Salt Lake City Corporation, 814 F.3d 1151