History
  • No items yet
midpage
Savage v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
16-769
| Fed. Cl. | Feb 13, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner Joann Savage filed a petition under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program alleging shoulder injury from a September 1, 2015 influenza vaccination.
  • The Special Master issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on the respondent’s proffer on October 11, 2016.
  • On October 20, 2016 petitioner filed an unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees and costs seeking $11,034.00 in fees and $735.15 in costs (total $11,769.15). Petitioner stated she had no out-of-pocket expenses.
  • Respondent filed a response stating she did not object to the overall amount sought but reserved disagreement on specific hourly rates, hours, or costs in other matters.
  • The Special Master reviewed the request for reasonableness and, given the lack of objection to the total amount, granted the award as a lump sum payable jointly to petitioner and counsel.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether petitioner is entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs under the Vaccine Act Savage sought $11,769.15 to cover all attorneys’ fees and litigation costs incurred Respondent did not oppose the overall amount but reserved any challenge to specific rates/hours in other contexts Award granted in full: $11,769.15 as a lump sum payable jointly to petitioner and counsel
Whether petitioner incurred out-of-pocket expenses Petitioner stated she incurred none Respondent did not dispute Court accepted petitioner’s signed statement of no out-of-pocket expenses
Whether the requested award covers all legal expenses and prevents additional charges by counsel Petitioner requested that the award cover all fees and costs Respondent noted lack of objection to total amount only Court stated the award is intended to cover all legal expenses and counsel may not collect additional fees under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(3)
Whether the decision should be posted publicly and whether redactions are permitted Not applicable Not applicable Decision to be posted per E-Government Act with 14-day opportunity for petitioner to request redactions under Vaccine Rule 18(b)

Key Cases Cited

  • Beck v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (attorney fee awards under the Vaccine Act encompass all charges by counsel and bar additional collection beyond the award)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Savage v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: Feb 13, 2017
Docket Number: 16-769
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.