Savage v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
16-769
| Fed. Cl. | Feb 13, 2017Background
- Petitioner Joann Savage filed a petition under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program alleging shoulder injury from a September 1, 2015 influenza vaccination.
- The Special Master issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on the respondent’s proffer on October 11, 2016.
- On October 20, 2016 petitioner filed an unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees and costs seeking $11,034.00 in fees and $735.15 in costs (total $11,769.15). Petitioner stated she had no out-of-pocket expenses.
- Respondent filed a response stating she did not object to the overall amount sought but reserved disagreement on specific hourly rates, hours, or costs in other matters.
- The Special Master reviewed the request for reasonableness and, given the lack of objection to the total amount, granted the award as a lump sum payable jointly to petitioner and counsel.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether petitioner is entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs under the Vaccine Act | Savage sought $11,769.15 to cover all attorneys’ fees and litigation costs incurred | Respondent did not oppose the overall amount but reserved any challenge to specific rates/hours in other contexts | Award granted in full: $11,769.15 as a lump sum payable jointly to petitioner and counsel |
| Whether petitioner incurred out-of-pocket expenses | Petitioner stated she incurred none | Respondent did not dispute | Court accepted petitioner’s signed statement of no out-of-pocket expenses |
| Whether the requested award covers all legal expenses and prevents additional charges by counsel | Petitioner requested that the award cover all fees and costs | Respondent noted lack of objection to total amount only | Court stated the award is intended to cover all legal expenses and counsel may not collect additional fees under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(3) |
| Whether the decision should be posted publicly and whether redactions are permitted | Not applicable | Not applicable | Decision to be posted per E-Government Act with 14-day opportunity for petitioner to request redactions under Vaccine Rule 18(b) |
Key Cases Cited
- Beck v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (attorney fee awards under the Vaccine Act encompass all charges by counsel and bar additional collection beyond the award)
