Sarah G. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services
264 P.3d 831
Alaska2011Background
- Four children (Wes, Marco, Dustin, Skyla) are Indian children under ICWA; biological mother Sarah has a history of abusive relationships with partners Wilson and Frank.
- OCS previously removed children in 2006 due to ongoing physical assaults, resulting in temporary custody and later a 2007 CINA finding under AS 47.10.011(8) and (9).
- In 2009 the children were returned to Sarah; she divorced Wilson and obtained a restraining order; she began a relationship with Frank.
- February 2010 reports of harm and a violent incident involving Frank led OCS to seek emergency temporary custody; the children reported abuse and physical discipline at home.
- OCS placed the children in foster/therapeutic settings; Marco and Wes faced behavioral and substance issues, Skyla required hospital/therapeutic care, and Dustin had significant mental-health needs.
- Superior Court adjudicated all four children as in need of aid under AS 47.10.011(8), (10), and (11); Wes and Marco also under (4) and (6); Sarah appeals.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether CINA exists under AS 47.10.011(8)(B)(ii) due to continued tendency and risk of mental injury | Sarah contends no continued tendency and no substantial risk. | State argues evidence shows ongoing pattern of abusive relationships and that domestic violence risks mental injury. | Affirmed; evidence supports continued tendency and substantial risk to children. |
| Whether the court erred by relying on journal entries to support AS 47.10.011(10); | Sarah challenges reliance on entries she alleges are misclassified letters about mental illness. | Court may rely on totality of evidence; the (8) finding suffices and mootness of (10) is not dispositive. | Not necessary to decide on (10); substantial evidence supports (8); concerns about exhibits noted. |
Key Cases Cited
- Danielle A. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children's Servs., 215 P.3d 349 (Alaska 2009) (cINA review; consideration of past conduct permissible)
- A.H. v. State, Dep't of Health & Servs., 10 P.3d 1156, 10 P.3d 1156 (Alaska 2000) (domestic violence witnessing harms children; reliance in CINA)
- Winston J. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children's Servs., 134 P.3d 343 (Alaska 2006) (substantial risk of mental injury from domestic violence)
- In re J.A., 962 P.2d 173 (Alaska 1998) (domestic violence court considerations in CINA)
- Jon S. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children’s Servs., 212 P.3d 756 (Alaska 2009) (precedent on reviewing CINA findings)
