midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
549 B.R. 556
D. Conn.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Sapphire filed Chapter 11 on the eve of a state-court trial seeking to void a transfer of the Ridgefield property.
  • McKay sought dismissal for cause under 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b)(1) alleging bad faith filing.
  • Bankruptcy court found bad faith and dismissed; on remand, hearing established further facts about finances and subdivision prospects.
  • Court found Sapphire had no employees, no ongoing business, and the property as its sole asset with substantial secured debt
  • Evidence showed Longman-controlled entities funded Sapphire and that subdivision plans had not been pursued credibly; credibility of Longman was questioned.
  • Appellants challenged abstention history but the district court ultimately affirmed dismissal and declined §1112(b)(2) exceptions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the bad faith finding clearly erroneous? McKay argues bad faith lacked clear support. Sapphire asserts factual basis supports bad faith. Bad faith finding upheld
Does the record show objective futility of reorganization if required? McKay contends objective futility is shown. Sapphire argues there is chance of reorganization. Record supports objective futility; dismissal affirmed
Did § 1112(b)(2) exception apply to bar dismissal? Sapphire/Hudson City contend unusual circumstances and plan likelihood justify retention. Bankruptcy court properly identified lack of reasonable plan and zoning hurdles. Exception not satisfied; §1112(b)(2) does not apply

Key Cases Cited

  • In re C-TC 9th Ave. P’ship, 113 F.3d 1304 (2d Cir.1997) (eight-factor test for subjective bad faith in filing)
  • LaSalle Bank Nat. Ass’n v. Nomura Asset Capital Corp., 424 F.3d 195 (2d Cir.2005) (appraisal standards and financial significance in bankruptcy)
  • In re Comcoach Corp., 698 F.2d 571 (2d Cir.1983) (code purposes guide interpretation of bankruptcy terms)
  • In re Plan. Corp., 777 F.3d 594 (2d Cir.2015) (clarified standard for appellate review of bankruptcy decisions)
  • Young v. Higbee Co., 324 U.S. 204 (U.S.1955) (bankruptcy protection and creditor protection purposes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sapphire Development, LLC v. McKay
Court Name: District Court, D. Connecticut
Date Published: Feb 1, 2016
Citations: 549 B.R. 556; 2016 WL 389961; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11179; No. 3:15-cv-1570 (MPS); No. 3:15-cv-1097 (MPS)
Docket Number: No. 3:15-cv-1570 (MPS); No. 3:15-cv-1097 (MPS)
Court Abbreviation: D. Conn.
Log In
    Sapphire Development, LLC v. McKay, 549 B.R. 556