History
  • No items yet
midpage
Santacroce v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
15-555
| Fed. Cl. | Dec 28, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner Sabrina Santacroce filed a Vaccine Program claim on behalf of her son J.R. alleging Varivax, Prevnar, and hepatitis A vaccines administered March 8, 2013 caused dystonia musculorum deformans.
  • J.R. had earlier vaccinations in April 2012 and subsequent vaccinations in August 2013; petitioner reported onset of abnormal movements and other symptoms after the March 2013 and August 2013 shots.
  • Medical records (neurologic exam and prolonged EEG) showed normal neurological findings, developmental milestones normal, and treating clinicians attributed episodes to behavioral/temper tantrum phenomena rather than seizures or a neurologic disorder.
  • A VAERS report described seizure-like activity after August 2013 vaccinations, but treating physicians’ objective testing and notes contradicted that characterization.
  • Petitioner acknowledged she likely could not meet the burden to prove medical/scientific causation and moved for dismissal; no expert report was submitted to support causation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether vaccines caused J.R.’s dystonia (causation-in-fact) Vaccines temporally associated with onset; vaccines caused abnormal movements Medical records and testing do not support a vaccine-caused neurologic condition; behavioral explanation fits findings Dismissed for failure to prove medical causation; temporal association insufficient
Whether petitioner provided a persuasive medical theory linking vaccine to injury Implicitly argued vaccines explain symptoms; relied on temporal proximity No expert or reputable medical explanation provided in record Dismissed: petitioner failed to present a medical theory or expert support
Whether other evidence (VAERS, parental reports) can substitute for medical records/expert opinion VAERS and parental observations show post-vaccination events supporting claim VAERS and lay reports do not overcome objective normal testing and treating clinicians’ conclusions Dismissed: unsubstantiated assertions cannot satisfy Vaccine Act burden
Timeliness/statute of limitations regarding 2012 vaccinations If April 2012 vaccines caused onset within days, claim would be time-barred; petitioner instead alleged 2013 events Respondent notes potential statute of limitations and problems alleging hereditary condition caused by vaccine Court observed statute-of-limitations issue and genetic nature of dystonia as additional concerns; dismissal stands on causation failure

Key Cases Cited

  • Althen v. Sec’y of HHS, 418 F.3d 1274 (Fed. Cir.) (establishes three-part test for causation in Vaccine Program)
  • Grant v. Sec’y of HHS, 956 F.2d 1144 (Fed. Cir.) (absence of other causes does not satisfy petitioner’s affirmative burden; need reputable medical/scientific explanation)
  • Shyface v. Sec’y of HHS, 165 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir.) (petitioner must show vaccination was a substantial factor in causing injury)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Santacroce v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: Dec 28, 2016
Docket Number: 15-555
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.