History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sanders v. State
103 So. 3d 775
Miss. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Sanders killed Baxstrum outside Curlee’s bar; jury convicted murder (2003).
  • On appeal, Sanders challenged a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction and his counsel’s effectiveness.
  • Circuit court had previously found Sanders competent to stand trial after a competency remand following Sanders v. State (Miss. 2009).
  • Witnesses Edwards and Anderson testified Sanders shot Baxstrum from behind; Sanders testified Baxstrum or he had provocation and a prior relationship with Rhoda.
  • Court held no sudden provocation and no immediate heat-of-passion evidence; instruction properly refused.
  • Because the record was inadequate to resolve IAC claims on direct appeal, the court dismissed those claims without prejudice.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Heat-of-passion instruction proper? Sanders. Sanders. Instruction properly refused.
Ineffective assistance of counsel? Sanders. Sanders. IAC claims dismissed without prejudice on record adequacy.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Shaw, 880 So.2d 296 (Miss. 2004) (manslaughter included to murder; propriety of instructions)
  • Ruffin v. State, 444 So.2d 839 (Miss. 1984) (murder vs. manslaughter jury instruction standard)
  • Agnew v. State, 783 So.2d 699 (Miss. 2001) (heat of passion requires immediate provocation)
  • Graham v. State, 582 So.2d 1014 (Miss. 1991) (definition of heat of passion and superiority of reason)
  • Smith v. State, 76 So.3d 170 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009) (cooling-off period negates heat-of-passion instruction)
  • Neal v. State, 15 So.3d 388 (Miss. 2009) (suspicion of infidelity not immediate provocation} {"caseCaption":"Mullen v. State","citation":"986 So.2d 320","courtYear":"Miss. Ct. App. 2007","parenthetical":"mere anger insufficient for heat-of-passion"},{"caseCaption":"Sanders v. State","citation":"9 So.3d 1132","courtYear":"Miss. 2009","parenthetical":"competency remand context cited"}]} } } should be corrected to valid json. Actually final requires proper JSON with array elements; adjust formatting. Let's provide corrected. )
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sanders v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Dec 11, 2012
Citation: 103 So. 3d 775
Docket Number: No. 2011-KA-00608-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.