History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sandel v. Choma
2017 Ohio 8301
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Father (Choma) and Mother (Sandel) are divorced parents; support obligations shifted over time and ultimately Mother paid support to Father.
  • CSEA calculated a child support overpayment by Mother of $12,587.37 as of August 14, 2014; later CSEA reported $12,409.31 as of March 31, 2016.
  • Father moved (Jan 29, 2015) for increased child support and reimbursement of medical expenses he paid; Mother moved for repayment of the overpayment and reimbursement of medical expenses she paid.
  • Magistrate (May 2016) found Mother had overpaid; after offsetting medical expenses and arrears, magistrate found Father owed Mother $7,320.61.
  • Trial court amended income/support figures, used a $16,166.53 figure (from Father’s worksheet) as the overpayment, offset medical expenses and recalculated arrears, and entered judgment for Mother for $6,523.20.
  • Father appealed, arguing the trial court double‑credited Mother for support payments; the appellate court agreed and remanded for recalculation.

Issues

Issue Father’s Argument Mother’s Argument Held
Whether the trial court erred in calculating Mother’s child‑support overpayment and net judgment Trial court double‑credited Mother for child support payments, inflating the overpayment judgment Trial court correctly offset CSEA overpayment with medical expenses and arrears to arrive at net amount owed to Mother Reversed: court abused discretion by crediting Mother more than once; remanded to recalculate net amount
Whether the court retained jurisdiction to resolve support/overpayment after children’s emancipation Father argued court had jurisdiction because motions were filed before emancipation and overpayments accrued earlier Mother did not dispute jurisdiction; trial court proceeded to resolve past obligations Court held it retained jurisdiction to reduce past support and overpayments to judgment and to offset arrearages against overpayments

Key Cases Cited

  • Bercaw v. Bercaw, 45 Ohio St.3d 160 (Ohio 1989) (court retains authority to reduce past support obligations to judgment)
  • Mihna v. Mihna, 48 Ohio App.3d 303 (8th Dist. 1988) (domestic relations court may offset arrearages against overpayments)
  • Jefferies v. Stanzak, 135 Ohio App.3d 176 (12th Dist. 1999) (equitable offset of support arrearages and overpayments is permissible)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sandel v. Choma
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 25, 2017
Citation: 2017 Ohio 8301
Docket Number: 28476
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.