History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sanchez v. State
2010 Ind. LEXIS 805
| Ind. | 2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Sanchez was convicted of three counts of class A felony child molesting involving his two stepdaughters.
  • The incidents occurred between 2006 and 2007; Sanchez married the victims’ mother in 2002 and acted as a father figure.
  • The victims testified Sanchez touched their private areas; V1 was six and V2 was nine at the time.
  • A physician noted incomplete hymens but no injuries, diagnosing possible molestation and consistency with complaints.
  • The trial court sentenced 40 years on each count, with the two V1 counts concurrent and consecutive to the V2 count; the Court of Appeals affirmed; the Supreme Court granted transfer to address the sentence and revised it to be served concurrently.
  • The Court revises Sanchez’s sentences to 30 years for the two V1 counts and 40 years for the V2 count, all concurrent, and remands for amendment of the order without a hearing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the aggregate sentence is inappropriate based on the offenses and Sanchez’s character Sanchez contends the aggregate sentence is inappropriate State argues the enhanced and consecutive terms are warranted Aggregate sentence revised to concurrent terms; overall 30 years for V1 and 40 years for V2, to be served concurrently.

Key Cases Cited

  • Anglemyer v. State, 868 N.E.2d 482 (Ind. 2007) (requires detailed reasons for sentence and review for abuse of discretion)
  • Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219 (Ind. 2008) (difficulty in reviewing and revising sentences; focus on aggregate length and serving)
  • Tyler v. State, 903 N.E.2d 463 (Ind. 2009) (no injury or significant force may justify revision of enhanced sentence)
  • Rivers v. State, 915 N.E.2d 141 (Ind. 2009) (consecutive to concurrent considerations when offenses are limited in time and scope)
  • Harris v. State, 897 N.E.2d 927 (Ind. 2008) (ongoing molestation with trust position can justify enhancements)
  • Serino v. State, 798 N.E.2d 852 (Ind. 2003) (appellate review of sentences limited and cautious)
  • Monroe v. State, 886 N.E.2d 578 (Ind. 2008) (prior driving-related offenses unconnected to molestation not substantial)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sanchez v. State
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 22, 2010
Citation: 2010 Ind. LEXIS 805
Docket Number: 20S04-1012-CR-692
Court Abbreviation: Ind.