History
  • No items yet
midpage
217 N.C. App. 146
N.C. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Marie Salomon, a CNA at The Oaks of Carolina, claimed a compensable right arm/shoulder injury on March 8, 2009.
  • She moved a partially paralyzed elderly resident without assistance due to understaffing.
  • The resident unexpectedly pushed back, causing Salomon to suffer a shoulder injury while handling him with one arm.
  • The Industrial Commission initially denied the claim; the Full Commission later found a compensable injury by accident and awarded temporary total disability.
  • Defendants challenged the findings as unsupported by competent evidence and contended the injury occurred during normal duties, not by accident.
  • The court affirmed in part but remanded to address a deficient disability analysis under the third Russell prong.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was Salomon's injury a compensable injury by accident? Salomon contends the unusual, unexpected push caused the injury. The injury occurred during normal duties due to staffing shortfalls, not an accident. Yes; the push was an unexpected condition during routine activity, supporting an accident finding.
Did the Commission have adequate findings to award temporary total disability? Salomon satisfied Russell prongs by showing ongoing disability and reasonable job search. The findings were insufficient to prove disability, especially under the second Russell prong. Partially reversed and remanded; the disability ruling and findings must address the third Russell prong with adequate detail.

Key Cases Cited

  • Konrady v. U.S. Airways, Inc., 165 N.C.App. 620 (2004) (unforeseen circumstances during routine activity support accident conclusion)
  • Gray v. RDU Airport Auth., 203 N.C.App. 521 (2010) (unusual conditions during work can create accident inference)
  • McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc., 358 N.C. 488 (2004) (burden shifting after constructive termination varies with disability proof)
  • Russell v. Lowes Prod. Distribution, 108 N.C.App. 762 (1993) (disability proof options under Russell's four-prong framework)
  • Johnson v. Herbie's Place, 157 N.C.App. 168 (2003) (insufficient detailed findings on disability require remand)
  • Johnson v. Southern Tire Sales & Serv., 358 N.C. 701 (2004) (detailed, fact-specific findings needed to prove disability under Russell)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Salomon v. OAKS OF CAROLINA
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 15, 2011
Citations: 217 N.C. App. 146; 718 S.E.2d 204; 2011 WL 5540944; 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 2339; COA11-511
Docket Number: COA11-511
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
Log In
    Salomon v. OAKS OF CAROLINA, 217 N.C. App. 146