History
  • No items yet
midpage
Salame v. 1st Priority Restoration, Inc.
2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7522
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • In 2007 1st Priority Restoration provided water-extraction and cleaning services to Salame under a written contract that included a 1.5% per month service charge for nonpayment and an attorney’s-fee provision for collection actions.
  • Salame failed to pay and alleged 1st Priority damaged a rug; 1st Priority sued for breach of contract, quantum meruit, civil theft, and check fraud.
  • The circuit court granted summary judgment to 1st Priority on breach of contract but reserved damages and attorney’s fees; other claims were dismissed under the economic loss rule and the case was transferred to county court.
  • The county court held a hearing, entered final judgment for 1st Priority, found 1st Priority the prevailing party entitled to attorney’s fees under the contract, and fixed fees and costs; Salame appealed arguing the court prematurely determined the prevailing party before resolving his set-off defense.
  • The circuit court appellate division issued a per curiam affirmance; Salame petitioned this Court for second-tier certiorari to quash that affirmance.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court could determine the prevailing party for attorney’s fees before resolving Salame’s set-off defense Court erred by deciding prevailing party before adjudicating set-off; prevailing-party determination depends on final resolution of all substantial issues Even if set-off succeeded, invoice plus contractual service charges exceed any alleged set-off, so Salame cannot prevail Trial court erred by prematurely determining prevailing party, but error did not cause miscarriage of justice; certiorari denied
Whether the appellate division’s per curiam affirmance departed from essential requirements of law Affirmance departed from established law because prevailing party was decided without resolving all claims Affirmance harmless because record shows Salame could not prevail even if set-off succeeded No departure producing miscarriage of justice under second-tier certiorari standard; petition denied
Whether second-tier certiorari is available to correct this alleged error Salame argues certiorari is proper because a clear legal principle was violated resulting in miscarriage of justice 1st Priority (and majority) argue certiorari relief is inappropriate because error was harmless Relief denied: certiorari is limited and not warranted absent miscarriage of justice
Whether factual re-weighing by this Court is permissible under second-tier review Salame contends factual issues (set-off) must be resolved by lower court, not reversed on certiorari Majority contends record facts show set-off could not overcome judgment, so harmless error Dissent: Court exceeded certiorari scope by re-weighing facts; majority nonetheless denies certiorari on harmless-error grounds

Key Cases Cited

  • Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523 (Fla. 1995) (scope of certiorari review and departure-from-essential-requirements standard)
  • City of Ctr. Hill v. McBryde, 952 So.2d 599 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (definition of departure resulting in miscarriage of justice)
  • Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 62 So.3d 1086 (Fla. 2010) (certiorari cannot correct mere legal error absent miscarriage of justice)
  • Kapila v. AT & T Wireless Servs., Inc., 973 So.2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (cannot determine prevailing party while causes of action remain)
  • Burnstein v. 5838 Condo., Inc., 430 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (no prevailing party for fees until litigation ends)
  • Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1983) (standards for certiorari review referencing miscarriage of justice)
  • Wekiva Springs Reserve Homeowners v. Binns, 61 So.3d 1190 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (second-tier certiorari relief only for clear legal violations causing miscarriage of justice)
  • United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Santa Fe Medical Center, 21 So.3d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (limitations on certiorari relief)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Salame v. 1st Priority Restoration, Inc.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 24, 2017
Citation: 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7522
Docket Number: 3D16-2200
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.