Ruiz v. Texas
137 S. Ct. 1246
| SCOTUS | 2017Background
- Supreme Court denies application for stay of execution in Ruiz v. Texas; Justice Breyer dissents.
- Rolando Ruiz has been on death row for 22 years, mostly in permanent solitary confinement.
- Ruiz contends that execution would violate the Eighth Amendment due to prolonged solitary confinement and associated mental distress.
- Lower courts found the 22-year delay largely attributable to the State and lower courts.
- The opinion cites concerns about solitary confinement from historical and more recent cases and notes the unusual stress of execution looming.
- Breyer’s dissent argues for constitutional scrutiny of extended solitary confinement and would grant a stay to allow fuller review.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether extended solitary confinement before execution violates the Eighth Amendment. | Ruiz asserts long-term isolation causes cruel punishment. | Texas contends management of death row does not violate the Amendment. | Stay denied |
| Whether the 22-year delay before execution constitutes unconstitutional delay under the Eighth Amendment. | Delay exacerbates harm of solitary confinement. | Delay caused by procedural/postconviction processes and state actions. | Stay denied |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Medley, 134 U.S. 160 (1890) (uncertainty before execution is among the most horrible experiences)
- Ruiz v. Quarterman, 504 F.3d 523 (5th Cir. 2007) (delay on death row attributable to state and court proceedings)
