History
  • No items yet
midpage
425 S.W.3d 554
Tex. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Officer Dickinson stopped Roy Anthony Francis at ~2:30 a.m. for driving at night without headlights and arrested him for DWI.
  • Francis moved to suppress arguing fog lights alone at night are not a traffic violation; trial court denied.
  • Francis pled guilty with 100 days’ confinement suspended, 18 months’ community supervision, $750 fine; he appeals denial of suppression.
  • At the suppression hearing, the officer explained fog lights vs headlights and testified headlights are required at night; the State argued in pari materia readings support a violation.
  • The trial court referenced minimum lighting requirements and denied the suppression; this court must determine whether driving with only fog lights at night violates the Transportation Code.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is driving at night with only fog lights a traffic violation? Francis contends no headlights are required by statute. State argues headlights are required and can be read with related sections. Yes; driving without headlights at night violates the code.
Do the cited Transportation Code provisions require headlights at night when fog lights exist? Reading 547.302(a) alone shows no headlamps required. Reading 547.302, 547.321, 547.328 supports a violation. Headlamps are required at night; fog lights alone do not satisfy the duty.
Is there any statutory conflict preventing a finding of a traffic violation? Argues potential conflict among sections; absurd results avoided. No irreconcilable conflict; specific provisions prevail when necessary. No irreconcilable conflict; statutes construed to require headlights at night.
Was the stop and denial of suppression proper under the statutory framework? Disagrees with the stop’s basis. Stops valid under 547.302 and related provisions. Motion to suppress properly denied; judgment affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Gray, 158 S.W.3d 465 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (probable cause for traffic-stop based on observed offense)
  • Anderson v. State, 701 S.W.2d 868 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985) (driving without headlights at night is a traffic offense)
  • Throneberry v. State, 109 S.W.3d 52 (Tex. App. Fort Worth 2003) (analysis of nighttime lighting requirements)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Roy Anthony Francis v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 27, 2014
Citations: 425 S.W.3d 554; 2014 WL 782911; 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 2310; 02-13-00075-CR
Docket Number: 02-13-00075-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
Log In