Rowden v. Rowden
290 Ga. 65
| Ga. | 2011Background
- Divorce finalized May 26, 2010; Wife awarded primary physical custody and child support.
- Evidence showed both parents fit but poor ability to communicate and cooperate about the children.
- Wife’s income: $200,000 in 2009; dropped to $80,000 due to practice losses; current job $40,000 part-time since Feb 1, 2010.
- Husband’s income at trial: $26,000.
- Trial court awarded Wife primary custody and set child support; Husband appeals; Georgia Supreme Court affirms.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Custody award to Wife was proper? | Rowden contends custody should be shared or awarded to Husband. | Rowden argues trial court abused its discretion in denying him custody. | No abuse; award to Wife affirmed. |
| Should willful underemployment be considered for child support? | Rowden argues underemployment should reduce support under OCGA 19-6-15(f)(4)(D). | Rowden contends trial court should adjust support based on Wife’s income reduction. | Court properly considered reasons for Wife’s income change; no modification required. |
| Abatement of child support during summer visitation? | Rowden seeks abatement during summer visitation. | No duty to abate absent a court order or clear best-interest showing. | No abatement; presumptive support preserved. |
Key Cases Cited
- LaFont v. Rouviere, 283 Ga. 60, 656 S.E.2d 522 (Georgia Supreme Court 2008) (custody awards defer to trial court discretion when evidence supports ruling)
- Atkins v. Zachary, 243 Ga. 453, 254 S.E.2d 837 (Georgia Supreme Court 1979) (no automatic abatement of child support during visitation absent court order)
- James v. James, 246 Ga. 233, 271 S.E.2d 151 (Georgia Supreme Court 1980) (legislature does not specify abatement for visitation; court may not automatically reduce support)
