History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rotundo v. Village of Yorkville, New York
6:09-cv-01262
N.D.N.Y.
Apr 25, 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs Rotundo, Jr. and Rotundo sued the Village of Yorkville and village officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New York law.
  • Defendants moved for summary judgment; the court granted in part and denied in part on March 4, 2011, with several claims dismissed and others remaining for trial.
  • The prior decision dismissed Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process, substantive due process, and equal protection claims, along with NY state contract-related claims.
  • Summary judgment was denied as to First Amendment retaliation, NY free speech, prima facie tort, and loss of consortium claims, which remained for trial.
  • Plaintiffs moved for reconsideration to reinstate the dismissed Fourteenth Amendment and NY Constitution, Art. I, § 6 procedural due process claims.
  • The motion for reconsideration argued misinterpretation of Civil Service Law § 75 and sought to remedy a claimed error to protect public employees’ discipline/discharge rights.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Reconsideration of due process claim (Fourteenth Amendment). Rotundo argues § 75 was misread; remedy necessary to prevent manifest injustice. Defendants contend no new law, new evidence, or clear error to justify reconsideration. Denied; no clear error or manifest injustice shown.
Reconsideration of NY Constitution due process claim (Art. I, § 6). Rotundo asserts misinterpretation of § 75 affects procedural due process protections. Defendants maintain arguments were previously considered and no basis for reconsideration exists. Denied; no basis shown to alter the prior ruling.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Thornton, 160 U.S. 654 (U.S. 1896) (reconsideration standards and rationale)
  • Butler v. Finegan, 269 N.Y. 587 (N.Y. 1935) (historical treatment of reconsideration and error correction)
  • Spivak v. Delaney, 264 N.Y. 491 (N.Y. 1934) (precedent on reconsideration arguments)
  • Schaefer v. Rathmann, 237 A.D. 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep’t 1933) (older authorities cited on reconsideration standards)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Rotundo v. Village of Yorkville, New York
Court Name: District Court, N.D. New York
Date Published: Apr 25, 2011
Docket Number: 6:09-cv-01262
Court Abbreviation: N.D.N.Y.