History
  • No items yet
midpage
916 N.W.2d 70
Neb. Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • IRT (Roth Grading, Nebraska) manufactured and sold an "Impactor"; Martin Brothers (California) submitted a website inquiry and negotiated purchase by phone/email in late July–August 2016.
  • IRT sent a price quote and emailed a Contract Purchase Order on August 5; Martin Brothers returned a signed purchase order via email on August 9.
  • Parties exchanged additional calls/emails about shipping, a $1,000 shipping discount, and use/lease possibilities for the equipment.
  • Martin Brothers told IRT on August 16 it no longer wanted the Impactor; IRT treated this as a breach and sued in Cass County, Nebraska.
  • Martin Brothers moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction; the district court granted the motion, concluding a single contract and isolated communications were insufficient to establish minimum contacts. IRT appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Nebraska courts have specific personal jurisdiction over Martin Brothers based on the purchase transaction Martin Brothers initiated and repeatedly communicated about a six-figure purchase, signed the purchase order, and thus should have reasonably anticipated being haled into Nebraska court A single, isolated contract and limited communications with a Nebraska seller do not create continuous/systematic contacts or purposeful availment No specific jurisdiction: single purchase and related emails/calls did not create sufficient minimum contacts; dismissal affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Hand Cut Steaks Acquisitions v. Lone Star Steakhouse, 298 Neb. 705 (discusses two-step minimum-contacts analysis and limits of personal jurisdiction)
  • Quality Pork Internat. v. Rupari Food Servs., 267 Neb. 474 (contract-based contacts can support jurisdiction where substantial connection exists)
  • Kugler Co. v. Growth Products Ltd., 265 Neb. 505 (mere contract or interstate communications insufficient; consider prior negotiations and course of dealing)
  • RFD-TV v. WildOpenWest Finance, 288 Neb. 318 (monthly payments and limited dealings insufficient for jurisdiction despite repeated contacts)
  • Crete Carrier Corp. v. Red Food Stores, 254 Neb. 323 (single contract or few contacts do not establish jurisdiction absent ongoing relationship)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Roth Grading v. Martin Bros. Constr.
Court Name: Nebraska Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 29, 2018
Citations: 916 N.W.2d 70; 25 Neb. Ct. App. 928; 25 Neb. App. 928; A-17-097
Docket Number: A-17-097
Court Abbreviation: Neb. Ct. App.
Log In
    Roth Grading v. Martin Bros. Constr., 916 N.W.2d 70