History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ross v. Linebarger, Goggan, Blair & Sampson, L.L.P.
333 S.W.3d 736
Tex. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Fort Bend County sued Phoenix for unpaid 2004 taxes; a default judgment was entered in 2005.
  • Ross entered into an Installment Payment Agreement with Fort Bend County Tax Assessor to pay past-due taxes, including a clause that nonpayment would void the contract and allow foreclosure.
  • Ross defaulted, the property was sold to Gorringe in 2006, and Ross later redeemed the property in 2007 by paying $108,146, which Gorringe objected to as untimely.
  • Ross sued the taxing entities and Linebarger, Oyugi, Edwards, and Blair, alleging contract, misrepresentation, wrongful foreclosure, due process, and excess proceeds claims; Linebarger moved to dismiss on governmental-immunity grounds.
  • The trial court granted Linebarger’s plea to the jurisdiction; the court of appeals held it had interlocutory jurisdiction and affirmed dismissal based on Linebarger’s governmental immunity as an agent performing the governmental function of tax collection.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Linebarger is entitled to governmental immunity as a tax-collection agent Ross argues Linebarger is not immune Linebarger is immune as the agent of governmental entities Linebarger is entitled to immunity; dismissed.
Whether Ross sued Linebarger in its official capacity, triggering immunity Ross sued Linebarger in multiple capacities Ross's claims are against Linebarger in its official capacity as an agent Claims are in official capacity; interlocutory appeal proper.
Whether evidentiary rulings merit reversal Ross objected to and moved to strike Linebarger’s evidence Evidentiary rulings were proper and non-dispositive No reversible error; affirmed evidentiary rulings.

Key Cases Cited

  • City of Houston v. First City National Bank, 827 S.W.2d 462 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992) (tax collection activity governmental, not proprietary; immunity preserved for collection actions)
  • Koseoglu v. Texas A&M Univ. Sys., 233 S.W.3d 835 (Tex. 2007) (official capacity treated as action against employing governmental entity; immunity scope)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Ross v. Linebarger, Goggan, Blair & Sampson, L.L.P.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 18, 2010
Citation: 333 S.W.3d 736
Docket Number: 01-10-00082-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.