Rosanto Ordinario v. Lvnv Funding, LLC
16-55417
| 9th Cir. | Dec 7, 2017Background
- Ordinario sued under the FDCPA and the Rosenthal Act, alleging LVNV filed a time‑barred state court action to collect credit card debt.
- LVNV had pursued a state court claim framed as an account stated/open book, not as breach of the underlying cardholder contract.
- Ordinario made his last payment on June 18, 2009; Chase issued a final statement in January 2010, charged a late fee on January 13, 2010, and closed the account January 30, 2010.
- LVNV filed the state court action on December 5, 2012.
- The central legal question was whether the state court claim was barred by California’s four‑year limitations period for accounts stated/book accounts.
- The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court, holding LVNV’s state court action was timely and therefore there was no FDCPA or Rosenthal Act violation.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether LVNV’s state court account stated claim was time‑barred under California’s four‑year statute | Ordinario argued the limitations period began earlier (last payment) or at least before the final charges/closure, making LVNV’s suit untimely | LVNV argued the cause accrued at the date of the last entry (late fee assessed Jan 13, 2010) or account closing, so suit filed within four years | Court held accrual was at the last entry (late fee Jan 13, 2010); LVNV’s Dec 5, 2012 suit was timely, so no FDCPA/Rosenthal violation |
| Whether an account stated existed | Ordinario disputed that an account stated was formed | LVNV argued monthly statements, payments, a final statement, and no dispute created an account stated | Court held an account stated existed as Ordinario received statements, made payments, received a final statement, and did not dispute it |
Key Cases Cited
- Zinn v. Fred R. Bright Co., 271 Cal. App. 2d 597 (Cal. Ct. App. 1969) (elements and nature of an account stated)
- Maggio, Inc. v. Neal, 196 Cal. App. 3d 745 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987) (account stated may be implied when a statement goes undisputed)
- R.N.C. Inc. v. Tsegeletos, 231 Cal. App. 3d 967 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991) (accrual when creditor demands payment or indicates termination of credit relationship)
- Prof'l Collection Consultants v. Lauron, 8 Cal. App. 5th 958 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017) (four‑year statute for account stated and open book; accrual at last item)
- O'Bryne v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC, [citation="596 F. App'x 565"] (9th Cir. 2015) (uncontested final credit card statement can establish an account stated)
- Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc., 592 F.3d 1027 (9th Cir. 2010) (standard of review for cross‑motions for summary judgment)
- Riggs v. Prober & Raphael, 681 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir. 2012) (de novo review of statutory interpretation under FDCPA/Rosenthal)
- Afewerki v. Anaya Law Grp., 868 F.3d 771 (9th Cir. 2017) (appellate affirmation may be grounded on any record-supported basis)
