History
  • No items yet
midpage
Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. Dorn Sprinkler Co.
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 3931
| 6th Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Union Suit seeks arbitration under a collective bargaining agreement; district court grants summary judgment finding Dorn Fire Protection not alter ego of Dorn Sprinkler.
  • Dorn Sprinkler formed in 1977; operation controlled by David Dorn; breached benefit fund contributions for three months in 2006–2007; caused a work stoppage January 2007 and closure in March 2007.
  • Christopher Dorn, son of David Dorn, formed Dorn Fire Protection, Inc., later Dorn Fire Protection, LLC, in the 1990s and began operations around 2006.
  • Union seeks to compel arbitration with Dorn Fire Protection as alter ego of Dorn Sprinkler; Dorn Fire Protection refuses arbitration, arguing no contract and no alter ego.
  • District court held no alter-ego relationship; held Dorn Fire Protection not liable for Dorn Sprinkler’s arbitration obligations.
  • On appeal, Court reviews de novo the alter-ego determination and factors including management, operation, equipment, customers, and ownership.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Dorn Fire Protection is the alter ego of Dorn Sprinkler Union contends alter ego due to shared leadership and business integration. Dorn Fire Protection is distinct in management, operations, and assets. Not an alter ego; no arbitration duty imposed.
What is the proper standard of review for alter-ego determinations at summary judgment Standard supports clear-error review for factual findings. De novo review appropriate for summary-judgment context. De novo review applies.

Key Cases Cited

  • NLRB v. Fullerton Transfer & Storage Ltd., 910 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1990) (articulates traditional alter-ego factors)
  • Trs. of Resilient Floor Decorators Ins. Fund v. A & M Installations, Inc., 395 F.3d 244 (6th Cir. 2005) (alter-ego standard and summary-judgment context)
  • Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Fund v. Indus. Contracting Co., 581 F.3d 313 (6th Cir. 2009) (discusses standard of review for alter-ego findings and clear-error language)
  • Yolton v. El Paso Tennessee Pipeline Co., 435 F.3d 571 (6th Cir. 2006) (discusses flexible, fact-intensive alter-ego analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. Dorn Sprinkler Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 28, 2012
Citation: 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 3931
Docket Number: 10-4368
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.