History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rivero v. Meister
2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16643
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Rivero and Cruz Irizarry (appellants) sued Meister (appellee) in Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal case No. 4D09-2555.
  • Trial court sanctioned the defendants’ attorneys for failing to appear at a scheduled jury trial, ordering immediate payment of $10,750 and $350 in lost wages.
  • Sanctions were based on inherent authority under Moakley v. Smallwood, but the court did not make an express finding of bad faith; instead it found negligence.
  • Calender call set May 18 as trial date; defendants’ attorneys allegedly did not monitor ahead-of-time case status as instructed and failed to check voicemail or notify others when called to trial.
  • On May 18, defendants failed to appear; court continued trial, plaintiff sought fees for preparation and appearance at trial.
  • Appellants appealed, arguing Moakley requires a specific express finding of bad faith; the court reversed and certified a question of public importance about whether reckless misconduct can constitute bad faith.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did Moakley require an express finding of bad faith for sanctions? Rivero argues bad faith is required; lack of express bad faith blocks sanctions. Meister argues sanctions may rest on negligence or inherent authority even without bad faith. Yes; Moakley requires express bad faith finding, so reversal.
Should reckless misconduct fall within bad faith for sanctions under Moakley? Rivero advocates a broad bad-faith scope including reckless conduct. Meister contends bad faith must be shown as per Moakley; not reckless negligence. Question certified to be decided by Florida Supreme Court.

Key Cases Cited

  • Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221 (Fla. 2002) (inherent sanctions require explicit bad-faith findings and specific facts)
  • Shniderman v. Fitness Innovations & Techs., Inc., 994 So.2d 508 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (abuse of discretion standard for sanctions)
  • Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Hammock, 489 So.2d 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (definition of recklessness in determining liability or sanctions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Rivero v. Meister
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 3, 2010
Citation: 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16643
Docket Number: 4D09-2555
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.