Rivera Rodriguez, Daisy v. Jc Penney Puerto Rico Inc
KLAN202400334
| Tribunal De Apelaciones De Pue... | May 28, 2024Background
- Daisy Rivera Rodríguez filed a lawsuit against JC Penney Puerto Rico and its insurer, AIG Insurance Company, alleging she suffered physical injuries after tripping over a "z-car" (a clothes cart) inside the JC Penney store in Caguas, Puerto Rico, in July 2020.
- Rivera claimed the store was negligent in leaving the cart in a walkway and sought damages for physical injuries and mental anguish, totaling $100,350.
- JC Penney's bankruptcy led to a stay in proceedings against it; the case continued solely against AIG.
- After discovery, AIG moved for summary judgment, arguing that the condition causing the fall was open and obvious and that Rivera was not exercising due care.
- The trial court initially denied the summary judgment request but later, upon reconsideration (unopposed by Rivera), granted AIG's motion and dismissed the case against AIG.
- Rivera appealed, arguing the existence of material facts requiring trial and contesting the court’s interpretation of business owner's liability.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether summary judgment was proper or factual disputes exist | Factual disputes about how the incident occurred mean a trial is needed | Cart was visible, Rivera not watching where she was walking; no material dispute | Summary judgment proper; no real factual dispute |
| Whether commercial premises liability was correctly applied | Store failed its duty to maintain safe premises | Store not absolute insurer; accident caused by Rivera’s lack of attention | Duty correctly applied; owner not absolute insurer |
| Whether proper procedure was followed in summary judgment | AIG did not meet procedural or substantive requirements | All procedural requirements for summary judgment met | Procedural requirements met by AIG |
| Whether denial of reconsideration was warranted | Court should have reconsidered due to unresolved facts | No new or material facts were presented on reconsideration | Denial appropriate; no new evidence or facts |
Key Cases Cited
- Torres v. Municipio de Mayagüez, 111 D.P.R. 158 (P.R. 1981) (establishes requirement of exercising personal care to avoid open and obvious hazards)
- Sociedad v. González Padín, 117 D.P.R. 94 (P.R. 1986) (duty of commercial establishments to maintain safe premises for patrons)
- Colón v. Kmart, 154 D.P.R. 510 (P.R. 2001) (business owner's duty and limitation of liability for patron injuries)
- Colón v. Plaza Las Américas, 136 D.P.R. 235 (P.R. 1994) (store not absolute insurer of patron safety; negligence must be shown)
