History
  • No items yet
midpage
106 F. Supp. 3d 1039
W.D. Mo.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • On April 28, 2012, a hailstorm damaged Riggins’ roof, gutters, and downspouts; she submitted a homeowner’s claim to American Family.
  • The policy allowed recovery either as actual cash value (ACV) or replacement cost; ACV was defined as “the amount it costs to repair or replace property with property of like kind and quality less depreciation for physical deterioration and obsolescence.”
  • American Family paid an ACV amount after deducting depreciation applied to the entire estimated repair cost, including materials and labor.
  • Riggins contended the policy language permits depreciation only for “physical deterioration and obsolescence,” not for labor; American Family moved for summary judgment defending its full depreciation approach.
  • The parties agreed the policy language is unambiguous and that obsolescence was not at issue; the sole legal question became whether labor costs may be depreciated under the ACV definition.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the policy’s ACV definition permits depreciation of labor in calculating ACV Riggins: “less depreciation for physical deterioration and obsolescence” limits depreciation to those categories and excludes depreciation of labor American Family: ACV contemplates a depreciated sum; depreciation may be applied to entire repair estimate, including labor Court: ACV language limits depreciation to physical deterioration and obsolescence; depreciating labor was improper

Key Cases Cited

  • Victor v. Home Sav. of America, 645 F. Supp. 1486 (E.D. Mo. 1986) (summary judgment appropriate when contract interpretation is unambiguous)
  • Howard v. Russell Stover Candies, Inc., 649 F.2d 620 (8th Cir. 1981) (affirming summary judgment principles in contract disputes)
  • Lupo v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., 70 S.W.3d 16 (Mo. 2002) (insurer policy terms given ordinary meaning; ambiguity required to avoid plain reading)
  • Porter v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., 242 S.W.3d 385 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007) (ACV understood as a depreciated sum where policy lacked an explicit ACV definition)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Riggins v. American Family Mutual Insurance
Court Name: District Court, W.D. Missouri
Date Published: Mar 27, 2015
Citations: 106 F. Supp. 3d 1039; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70839; 2015 WL 3421653; No. 2:14-cv-04171-SRB
Docket Number: No. 2:14-cv-04171-SRB
Court Abbreviation: W.D. Mo.
Log In
    Riggins v. American Family Mutual Insurance, 106 F. Supp. 3d 1039