History
  • No items yet
midpage
Riddell, Inc. v. United States
754 F.3d 1375
Fed. Cir.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Riddell imported football jerseys, pants, and girdles made of textiles (polyester/spandex); none included protective pads when imported, though each has pockets to accept pads worn during play.
  • Customs classified the jerseys and pants under chapters 61/62 (apparel) and the girdles under heading 6212; Riddell protested, arguing classification under chapter 95 (sports equipment), subheading 9506.99.20 (football equipment), which is duty-free.
  • The Court of International Trade granted summary judgment for the government, holding the items are "articles of apparel" under chapters 61 and 62, not sports equipment under chapter 95.
  • Riddell appealed; the parties agreed the merchandise facts were undisputed, so classification turned on legal interpretation of HTSUS headings and GRIs.
  • The appellate court affirmed classification of jerseys and pants as apparel, reversed the girdles’ classification under 6212 and held the girdles belong under subheading 6114.30.30 (other knitted garments).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether jerseys, pants, and girdles are "football equipment" under HTSUS 9506.99.20 Riddell: items are football equipment or parts/accessories and thus duty-free U.S.: items are textile garments classifiable under chapters 61/62, not chapter 95 Court: Not sports equipment; apparel under chapters 61/62
Whether apparel designed to accommodate protective pads converts to "sports equipment" Riddell: specialized design for sport makes them equipment U.S.: mere specialized apparel remains apparel absent transformative protective features Court: Specialized use alone insufficient; need transformative protective material (Bauer exception)
Whether items can be "parts or accessories" to chapter 95 equipment Riddell: pockets and intended use with pads make them accessories U.S.: Note 1 excludes sports clothing (chapters 61/62) from chapter 95 parts rule Court: Exclusion applies; apparel cannot be parts/accessories of chapter 95 goods
Proper apparel subheading for girdles Riddell: girdles are knitted garments (6114.30.30) U.S.: originally classified under 6212 but conceded girdles here lack body-support function Court: Girdles classified under 6114.30.30 (reversing 6212 classification)

Key Cases Cited

  • Bauer Nike Hockey USA, Inc. v. United States, 393 F.3d 1246 (Fed. Cir.) (items containing substantial integrated padding held sports equipment)
  • Lemans Corp. v. United States, 660 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir.) (apparel with limited padding can remain within apparel headings; sports equipment is mainly protective/non-apparel)
  • CamelBak Prods., LLC v. United States, 649 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir.) (standard of review and classification principles under HTSUS)
  • ABB, Inc. v. United States, 421 F.3d 1274 (Fed. Cir.) (items that perform separate function apart from other goods remain classifiable on their own)
  • Wilton Indus., Inc. v. United States, 741 F.3d 1263 (Fed. Cir.) (application of GRIs and HTSUS structure)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Riddell, Inc. v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Jun 20, 2014
Citation: 754 F.3d 1375
Docket Number: 2013-1384
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.