History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rickard v. BAC/FLEET (In re Rickard)
520 B.R. 486
Bankr. W.D. Pa.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy on July 2, 2010.
  • November 16, 2012, Mr. Rickard suffered a motor vehicle accident causing paraplegia.
  • Rickard was a participant in the Welfare Fund (ERISA plan) which paid medical expenses of at least $279,498.03.
  • Welfare Fund has a subrogation/reimbursement right for third-party-related injuries.
  • Debtors' counsel, Cutruzzula, was retained in 2013 with a contingency up to 40% of any recovery.
  • ANPC settled the underinsured motorist claim for $250,000; proposed distribution would allocate funds to counsel, bankruptcy counsel, and Mr. Rickard but not to Welfare Fund.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Welfare Fund's subrogation priority overrides attorney fees. Rickard argues fund’s interest is subordinate to attorney lien. Welfare Fund asserts its priority per plan language and ERISA rights. Welfare Fund priority prevails; plan language controls.
Whether McCutchen controls over Morrone regarding fee allocation when plan terms exist. Rickard argues for common-fund/equitable lien in absence of paying provisions. Welfare Fund contends McCutchen governs where plan expressly allocates costs and no agreement to pay fees is shown. McCutchen governs; plan terms prevail over equitable doctrines.
Does the plan expressly require Welfare Fund to be paid first from settlement proceeds? Fund’s priority is not explicitly honored in proposed distribution. Plan states Welfare Fund must be reimbursed first; no agreement to pay Debtors’ attorney fees. Yes; plan requires Welfare Fund to be paid first.

Key Cases Cited

  • Morrone v. Thuring, 759 A.2d 1238 (N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div. 2000) (ERISA plan rights; common-law charging lien can be subordinate to plan terms)
  • US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 133 S. Ct. 1537 (U.S. 2013) (plan terms govern; common-fund rule not applied against express contract)
  • In re Second Pennsylvania Real Estate Corp., 192 B.R. 663 (Bankr.W.D. Pa. 1995) (common fund doctrine; context of bankruptcy proceedings)
  • Novinger v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 809 F.2d 212 (3d Cir. 1987) (equitable charging liens; limitations in bankruptcy contexts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Rickard v. BAC/FLEET (In re Rickard)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 20, 2014
Citation: 520 B.R. 486
Docket Number: No. 10-24821-JAD
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. W.D. Pa.