History
  • No items yet
midpage
969 N.E.2d 727
Mass. App. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Carlin had constructive notice of the September 11, 1999 building permit issuance, aided by attorney Larkosh who knew plans and engaged with town officials.
  • Carlin had been monitoring Cohen's plans and previously challenged related permits, indicating awareness of Cohen's construction.
  • Construction on Cohen's property began in fall 2001.
  • Carlin first sought revocation of the permit via letters dated June 20 and September 21, 2004, and appealed on October 8, 2004; the town building inspector denied the appeal on December 14, 2004.
  • Carlin then pursued Land Court review, but the court granted summary disposition based on failure to appeal within 30 days and, independently, laches; the court also noted improper claim splitting and multiple actions against the neighbor structure.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether failure to appeal within 30 days bars the challenge Carlin argues timely appeal was required by law. Cohen argues untimely appeal defeats the claim. Barred by untimely appeal.
Whether laches independently bars the appeal Carlin contends no prejudice or undue delay. Cohen contends delay was prejudicial and unreasonable. Laches independently bars the appeal.
Whether multiple actions constitute improper claim splitting Carlin's successive suits were justified challenges to the same issue. Defendant asserts improper forum-shopping and prejudicial delay. Improper claim splitting supported dismissal.

Key Cases Cited

  • Gallivan v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Wellesley, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 850 (2008) (adequate notice may be actual or constructive; duty of inquiry when notice exists)
  • Connors v. Annino, 460 Mass. 790 (2010) (marginal questions about adequacy of notice; duty to inquire if evidence places inquiry burden)
  • Champagne v. Commissioner of Correction, 395 Mass. 382 (1985) (loches as an independent basis for decision in equity cases)
  • Cape Resort Hotels, Inc. v. Alcoholic L. Bd. of Falmouth, 385 Mass. 205 (1982) (public interest in health, safety, welfare provisions cannot be forfeited by government inaction; loches cannot bar enforcement by municipality in public interest context)
  • Myers v. Salin, 13 Mass. App. Ct. 127 (1982) (loches may justify summary disposition in certain private disputes)
  • Garabedian v. West-land, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 427 (2003) (loches as an equitable defense in private disputes)
  • Srebnick v. Lo-Law Transit Mgmt., Inc., 29 Mass. App. Ct. 45 (1990) (unjustified delay and prejudice support dismissal)
  • Cornell v. Michaud, 79 Mass. App. Ct. 607 (2011) (comparison of self-inflicted harm versus delayed litigation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Richardson v. Board of Appeals of Chilmark
Court Name: Massachusetts Appeals Court
Date Published: Jun 11, 2012
Citations: 969 N.E.2d 727; 81 Mass. App. Ct. 912; No. 11-P-961
Docket Number: No. 11-P-961
Court Abbreviation: Mass. App. Ct.
Log In