History
  • No items yet
midpage
Richards v. Illinois Tool Works Inc.
1:24-cv-02111
N.D. Ohio
May 5, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Delroy Richards, an employee at Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW), suffered a severe hand injury due to alleged inadequate guarding on a machine at work.
  • Richards initially sued ITW and the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (OBWC) in state court, but OBWC was later removed as a defendant for improper joinder.
  • ITW removed the case to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction; Richards is an Ohio citizen, and ITW provided evidence of diversity.
  • Richards then sought to amend his complaint, first to correct pleading deficiencies and then to replace 'John Doe' defendants with named supervisors, and to add or clarify claims.
  • ITW opposed addition of the individual supervisors as defendants, arguing there is no viable respondeat superior claim against them, and their inclusion could destroy diversity jurisdiction.
  • The court partially granted the motion to amend (allowing amendments except adding the supervisors) and denied the pending motion to dismiss as moot because a new complaint would be filed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether to allow amendment to add individual supervisors Must add supervisors to preserve respondeat superior claim No claim exists vicariously against individuals; destroys diversity Denied (no claim, possible jurisdiction issue)
Adequacy of pleading for intentional tort claim Proposed amendment cures deficiencies Prior complaint insufficient under heightened standards Granted (amendment to cure permitted)
Whether the motion to dismiss is still operative -- -- Moot—superseded by amended complaint
Jurisdiction upon addition of individual (Ohio) defendants Needed to preserve vicarious liability claims Would destroy diversity jurisdiction, as they are likely Ohio citizens Not permitted unless jurisdiction properly alleged

Key Cases Cited

  • Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 (U.S. 1962) (leave to amend should be freely given absent undue delay or prejudice)
  • Inge v. Rock Fin. Corp., 388 F.3d 930 (6th Cir. 2004) (liberal policy permitting amendment of pleadings)
  • Hauser v. City of Dayton Police Dep’t, 140 Ohio St. 3d 268 (Ohio 2014) (respondeat superior only creates liability for employer, not employees)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Richards v. Illinois Tool Works Inc.
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Date Published: May 5, 2025
Docket Number: 1:24-cv-02111
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ohio