History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rhinehart v. State
290 P.3d 921
Utah Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Rhinehart appeals from the summary dismissal of her Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Post-Conviction Relief.
  • The trial court converted the State's motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 due to outside materials.
  • Rhinehart's response included documents beyond the pleadings, which the court relied on in its decision.
  • The court reviewed Rhinehart's ineffective assistance claims under Strickland's two-prong standard for deficiency and prejudice.
  • The court concluded the plea was objectively reasonable, and rejected coercion and misadvice arguments; appellate misplea arguments were not obviously reversible error.
  • The court held that, procedurally, Rhinehart's challenges to the plea and competency were barred or not shown to be prejudicial; summary judgment for the State was proper.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court properly converted to summary judgment Rhinehart State Conversion proper; not plain error
Whether Rhinehart's ineffective assistance claims succeed Rhinehart State Claims fail under Strickland standard
Whether appellate counsel was ineffective for misplea doctrine invocation Rhinehart State Omission not obviously reversible error

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Holgate, 2000 UT 74 (Utah 2000) (preservation and plain error standards applied to claims)
  • State v. Dunn, 850 P.2d 1201 (Utah 1993) (plain error framework for mitigating errors)
  • Oakwood Vill. LLC v. Albertsons, Inc., 104 P.3d 1226 (Utah 2004) (conversion of 12(b) actions to summary judgment depends on evidence relied upon)
  • Walter v. Stewart, 67 P.3d 1042 (Utah App. 2003) (summary judgment based on outside materials proper when not excluded)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (defective performance must be prejudicial to be grounds for relief)
  • Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010) (withdrawal of plea requires reasonable probability of different outcome)
  • State v. Nicholls, 2009 UT 12 (Utah 2009) (objective reasonableness of plea advice)
  • State v. Young, 780 P.2d 1233 (Utah 1989) (distress does not by itself establish incompetence to plead)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Rhinehart v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: Nov 16, 2012
Citation: 290 P.3d 921
Docket Number: 20100599-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.