Rhea v. District Board of Trustees
109 So. 3d 851
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2013Background
- Rhea sued the College of Santa Fe College for mandamus relief (Count One) and a declaratory judgment (Count Two) in a second amended complaint.
- Count One alleged the e-mail requesting unredacted disclosure was a public record and the College violated the Public Records Act by withholding the name under FERPA.
- Count Two alleged the College violated its own Rule 7.36 governing student complaints and sought declaratory relief, damages, and costs.
- The trial court dismissed both counts with prejudice, finding FERPA barred disclosure of the unredacted e-mail and that no justiciable issue existed for declaratory relief.
- Rhea appealed, challenging the dismissal as to both counts.
- The appellate court affirmed, holding the unredacted e-mail is a public record but exempt under FERPA, and that no present justiciable need for a declaration existed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether FERPA exempts disclosure of the unredacted e-mail | Rhea argued the e-mail is not an education record and FERPA does not protect the name. | The College argued FERPA protections apply to education records and the unredacted e-mail contains student identifiers. | Count One affirmed; disclosure is barred by FERPA as an education record. |
| Whether Rhea is entitled to declaratory relief under Rule 7.36 | Rhea seeks declarations about rights under Rule 7.36 due to alleged violations affecting rehiring. | The College contends the e-mail was not a formal complaint and no live controversy exists for declaratory relief. | Count Two affirmed; no present justiciable controversy or right demonstrated. |
Key Cases Cited
- Shevin v. Byron, Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc., 379 So.2d 633 (Fla. 1980) (public records mandamus requires a clear legal right and duty)
- Meyers v. City of Jacksonville, 754 So.2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (dismissal for failure to state a claim; de novo standard of review)
- Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., 89 So.2d 482 (Fla.1956) (pleading standards and deference to complaint in dismissal context)
- Weaver v. Leon Cnty. Classroom Teachers Ass’n, 680 So.2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (limits on judicial consideration of pleadings)
- State v. City of Clearwater, 863 So.2d 149 (Fla. 2003) (public records definition and access standard)
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. Associated Press, 18 So.3d 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (public records not limited to paper; applies to digital records)
- Plymel v. Moore, 770 So.2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (mandamus and ministerial duties)
- Hatten v. State, 561 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1990) (mandamus elements and procedural posture)
- Town of Manalapan v. Rechler, 674 So.2d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (mandamus and ministerial duties; standards for relief)
