History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reineke v. Antero Resources Corporation
2:16-cv-00797
S.D. Ohio
Jan 2, 2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Robert Reineke was injured on July 8, 2015 while working at an Antero-owned oil well when a high-pressure vacuum hose was connected to the wrong tank and later released, striking his face.
  • Original complaint (Aug. 17, 2016) named Antero, Warrior Energy Services, and Superior; Amended complaint (Apr. 27, 2017) added AES (doing business as AES Safety Services) alleging AES was contracted to provide site safety and that AES and/or Warrior employees caused the injury.
  • Discovery indicated the workers who connected and released the hose were employed by Warrior, not AES.
  • Plaintiff moved under Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 to dismiss all claims against AES because AES was in Chapter 11 and discovery showed it was not the employer at issue.
  • Antero opposed only on the ground that AES was a necessary party under Rule 19. No other defendants opposed AES’s dismissal.
  • The Court granted the motion, dismissing and terminating AES as a party under Rule 21, concluding AES was only a potential joint tortfeasor and not a necessary or indispensable party.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether AES must remain as a party because it is a necessary party under Rule 19 AES is not necessary; discovery shows Warrior employees caused the injury and AES is, at most, a joint tortfeasor; AES may be dismissed under Rule 21 AES is necessary because AES employees allegedly caused Plaintiff's injuries and therefore must be part of litigation Court held AES is not a necessary or indispensable party; joint tortfeasors are not required to be joined under Rule 19 and AES was dismissed under Rule 21

Key Cases Cited

  • PaineWebber, Inc. v. Cohen, 276 F.3d 197 (6th Cir. 2001) (a joint tortfeasor is not a necessary party under Rule 19)
  • Temple v. Synthes Corp., 498 U.S. 5 (1990) (joint tortfeasors need not be joined as necessary parties)
  • Laethem Equip. Co. v. Deere & Co., [citation="485 F. App'x 39"] (6th Cir. 2012) (complete relief can be satisfied among present parties without joinder of other tortfeasors)
  • Philip Carey Mfg. Co. v. Taylor, 286 F.2d 782 (6th Cir. 1961) (Rule 21 governs dropping or adding parties)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Reineke v. Antero Resources Corporation
Court Name: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Date Published: Jan 2, 2018
Docket Number: 2:16-cv-00797
Court Abbreviation: S.D. Ohio