315 Ga. App. 582
Ga. Ct. App.2012Background
- Reeves, a lawyer, represented plaintiffs in a medical malpractice suit against an Upson County obstetrician.
- Reeves served a subpoena on Upson Regional Medical Center, a nonparty, seeking documents.
- Upson Regional moved to quash the subpoena; Reeves moved to compel production; the subpoena was withdrawn before ruling.
- Upson Regional sought attorney fees and expenses under OCGA § 9-15-14(b); the trial court awarded over $23,000 to the nonparty.
- Reeves petitioned for discretionary review; the Court of Appeals granted review to challenge the award.
- The Georgia Court of Appeals held that OCGA § 9-15-14(b) generally does not permit fee awards to nonparties and overruled Slone v. Myers to the extent it allowed such awards.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appellate jurisdiction timely? | Reeves | Upson Regional | Jurisdiction proper; petition timely following amended award. |
| Whether OCGA § 9-15-14(b) permits fee awards to nonparties? | Reeves argued nonparties may be awarded under (b). | Upson Regional argued nonparties cannot be awarded under (b). | Nonparties cannot generally receive fees under (b); Slone overruled. |
| Effect of Slone v. Myers on the statute's interpretation? | Reeves maintained Slone permissible. | Upson Regional argued Slone invalid. | Slone overruled; the statute has a plain meaning limiting awards to parties. |
| Interpretation of 'party' under OCGA § 9-15-14(d)? | Reeves contends nonparty rights immunize awarding. | Upson Regional contends 'party' means a named party to the litigation. | 'Party' refers to a named party; nonparty fees generally not permitted under (d). |
Key Cases Cited
- Slone v. Myers, 288 Ga.App. 8 (Ga. App. 2007) (held that nonparty fees could be awarded under 9-15-14(b))
- In re N.S.M., 183 Ga.App. 398 (Ga. App. 1987) (held nonparties cannot be awarded attorney fees under 9-15-14)
- Rice v. Lost Mountain Homeowners Assn., 288 Ga.App. 714 (Ga. App. 2007) (binding precedent on appellate procedure and finality issues)
- Jaheni v. State, 281 Ga.App. 213 (Ga. App. 2006) (signature requirements on filings related to appeals)
- Strength v. Lovett, 311 Ga. App. 35 (Ga. App. 2011) (statutory interpretation guiding plain-meaning approach)
