History
  • No items yet
midpage
541 B.R. 492
Bankr. D. Kan.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Adversary proceeding against SpiritBank; Brooke Corp bankruptcy trustee seeks avoidance for transfers related to SpiritBank Option Agreement and $2M CD pledge.
  • Brooke Corp held an approximately 62% interest in Aleritas; Debtors insolvent during relevant period; case began after Brooke converted to Chapter 7.
  • March 6, 2008 Option Agreement with SpiritBank to purchase SpiritBank’s participation in the FSB Loan; Brooke Corp pledged $2M CD as security and provided collateral.
  • SpiritBank liquidated the Brooke CD on September 4, 2008; funds were used to pay down Brooke-related obligations; BONY litigation and related matters followed.
  • Trustee alleges transfers were made within two years of petition, with Brooke insolvent, and seeks avoidance under 548 and UFTA, plus recovery under §550.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did Brooke have an interest in the funds used to purchase the Brooke CD? Trustee: Brooke exercised dominion/controlled funds; funds were Brooke’s property. SpiritBank: funds originated from GenBank and third parties; Brooke had no interest in the funds. Brooke had an interest; funds were property of the debtor.
Did Brooke receive reasonably equivalent value for incurring obligations under the Option Agreement? Trustee: no direct/indirect value; no equivalent value for Brooke Corp’s obligations. SpiritBank: Brooke received direct/indirect value, including reduced liability and collateral benefits. Brooke did not receive reasonably equivalent direct or indirect value.
Did Brooke receive indirect value for the Option Agreement as the parent Guarantor? Trustee: insolvency of subsidiary negates indirect benefit; indirect value unlikely. SpiritBank: as parent guarantor, Brooke benefited from downstream guarantees. No indirect value to Brooke Corp was proven.
Did Brooke pay Deferral Fees with reasonably equivalent value? Trustee: Deferral Fees lacked consideration; part of Option Agreement. SpiritBank: Deferral Fees provided forbearance and breathing room; value adequate. Deferral Fees were not constructively fraudulent; no avoidance of Deferral Fees.
Is the Brooke CD transfer a preferential transfer under §547? Trustee: separate from avoidance; if avoided, SpiritBank would be disadvantaged. SpiritBank: perfected interest; cashing CD not preferential under §547(b)(5). Transfer of the Brooke CD not a avoidable preference under §547.

Key Cases Cited

  • Parks v. FIA Card Services, N.A. (In re Marshall), 550 F.3d 1251 (10th Cir. 2008) (indirect-benefit/interest concept for transfers analyzed similarly to §547)
  • Tour Tellot v. Renegade Holdings, Inc., 457 B.R. 441 (Bankr.M.D.N.C. 2011) (insolvency of subsidiary limits indirect benefit presumption)
  • In re Pembroke Dev. Corp., 124 B.R. 398 (Bankr.S.D. Fla. 1991) (transfers to insolvent affiliate and value analysis under fraudulent transfer law)
  • In re Pace, 456 B.R. 253 (Bankr.W.D. Tex. 2011) (insolvency considerations in value determinations in fraudulent transfer)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Redmond v. SpiritBank (In re Brooke Corp.)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas
Date Published: Nov 20, 2015
Citations: 541 B.R. 492; 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 3985; CASE NO. 08-22786 (jointly administered); ADV. NO. 09-6070
Docket Number: CASE NO. 08-22786 (jointly administered); ADV. NO. 09-6070
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. D. Kan.
Log In
    Redmond v. SpiritBank (In re Brooke Corp.), 541 B.R. 492