History
  • No items yet
midpage
Redd v. New York Division of Parole
678 F.3d 166
| 2d Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Redd, a parole officer since 1990, sued the New York Division of Parole for Title VII claims.
  • In 2005, Area Supervisor Washington allegedly touched Redd’s breasts three times at the Queens I Office.
  • Redd reported concerns to Burgos, the HR director, but claims no effective action was taken.
  • Washington denied touching Redd and the Division submitted affidavits from Washington and Burgos.
  • The district court granted summary judgment dismissing the hostile environment claim, finding the conduct not sufficiently severe or pervasive.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Washington’s three touches were severe or pervasive. Redd: conduct was severe and pervasive. Division: conduct was minor/incidental and not pervasive. Yes, a factfinder could find severe/pervasive conduct.
Whether the harassment was because of Redd’s sex. Redd: conduct was sex-based discrimination. Division: no credible evidence of sex-based motivation. Yes, evidence supports inference of discrimination by sex.
Whether summary judgment was proper given material factual disputes. Redd: there are genuine issues of material fact. Division: no triable issues; evidence shows no liability. No; issues of fact preclude summary judgment on this claim.
Liability of the Division under supervisor-related harassment (Ellerth/Faragher defense). Division cannot avoid liability if conduct by supervisor altered conditions. Affirmative defense may apply if prevention/correction and plaintiff’s failure to use them are shown. Factual issues exist; defense viability requires trial.

Key Cases Cited

  • Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (U.S. 1986) (establishes hostile environment standard and objective/subjective components)
  • Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., 523 U.S. 75 (U.S. 1998) (same-sex harassment framework and proof of sex-based discrimination)
  • Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17 (U.S. 1993) (requires severe or pervasive conduct to alter conditions of employment)
  • Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (U.S. 1998) (outline of employer liability and defenses in harassment cases)
  • Ellerth v. Burlington Industries, 824 U.S. 761 (U.S. 1998) (employer liability framework when no tangible employment action)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Redd v. New York Division of Parole
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: May 4, 2012
Citation: 678 F.3d 166
Docket Number: Docket 10-1410-cv
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.