History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ray v. State
47 A.3d 1113
Md. Ct. Spec. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • On Oct. 5, 2010, the Expedition driven by Norris was stopped on I-270 after sergeant observed blue headlamps and suspected noncompliant lighting; Norris had a suspended license due to a child-support violation.
  • Ray was a passenger in the Expedition during the stop; other passengers included Mashea Ray and an unknown juvenile female.
  • After the stop, Norris exited the vehicle and the officers issued citations; the passengers, including Ray, were detained.
  • Mashea consented to a jacket-warrantless search; a wallet with counterfeit credit cards and identification was found; the cards bore the name Robert Smith and connected to a fraudulent ID.
  • Ray was later arrested; Nordstrom bags found in the vehicle tied to alleged purchase with counterfeit cards; Ray initially gave the name Daylin Seymour before the true identity was confirmed.
  • Ray proceeded by not guilty agreed statement of facts, with an agreement to waive jury trial as part of the plea-related process.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Reasonable suspicion to stop vehicle Ray contends White lacked reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the Expedition. Ray argues the stop was based on a hunch about blue headlamps, not a lawful violation. Yes, the stop was supported by reasonable articulable suspicion.
Probable cause to arrest Ray Ray argues there was no probable cause to arrest all passengers. Ray asserts lack of dominion over Mashea’s belongings negates joint possession. Yes, there was probable cause to arrest Ray given shared access and conduct suggesting a common enterprise.
Knowing waiver of jury trial under Rule 4-246(b) Ray contends the record did not show a knowing, intelligent waiver. State argues the advice-of-rights form plus on-record discussion show knowledge; any error was harmless. No reversible error; waiver knowingly made and on-record determination satisfied; any technical defect harmless.

Key Cases Cited

  • Byndloss v. State, 391 Md. 462 (Md. 2006) (stop based on observed violations; reasonable articulable suspicion)
  • Herring v. State, 198 Md.App. 60 (Md. 2011) (Fourth Amendment reasonableness of traffic stops; totality of circumstances)
  • Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (S. Ct. 2003) (car passenger probable cause when common enterprise and contraband visible)
  • Di Re, 332 U.S. 581 (U.S. 1948) (distinguishes blame for others in shared car from individualized probable cause)
  • Walker v. State, 406 Md. 369 (Md. 2008) (knowingly waiving jury right; totality of circumstances)
  • Boulden v. State, 414 Md. 284 (Md. 2010) (forfeiture and harmless error in jury-waiver on-record finding)
  • Aguilera v. State, 193 Md.App. 426 (Md. 2010) (Rule 4-246(b) knowingly/voluntarily waiver; substantial compliance)
  • Longshore v. State, 399 Md. 486 (Md. 2007) (probable cause standards in Maryland police arrests)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Ray v. State
Court Name: Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Date Published: Jul 2, 2012
Citation: 47 A.3d 1113
Docket Number: No. 1444
Court Abbreviation: Md. Ct. Spec. App.