Rausch v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
16-438
| Fed. Cl. | May 2, 2017Background
- Petitioner Marvin Rausch filed a Vaccine Act petition alleging SIRVA from an influenza vaccination on Aug 28, 2014.
- The Chief Special Master previously awarded compensation based on respondent’s proffer (decision issued Aug 19, 2016).
- Petitioner moved for attorneys’ fees and costs on Mar 6, 2017, seeking $16,588.10 in fees and $772.35 in costs (total $17,360.45).
- Petitioner filed a signed statement that he had no out-of-pocket expenses, per General Order #9.
- Respondent stated the Vaccine Act does not assign a role to respondent in fee determinations but conceded statutory requirements for an award were met and deferred to the Chief Special Master’s discretion.
- The Chief Special Master reviewed billing records, found the request reasonable, and granted the full award as a lump sum check payable jointly to petitioner and counsel.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether petitioner is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs under the Vaccine Act | Rausch contends he met statutory requirements and submitted reasonable billing to support the requested fees and costs | Respondent asserts no role in resolving fee requests but agrees statutory requirements are met and defers to the Special Master’s discretion | Award granted in full: $17,360.45 as a lump sum payable jointly to petitioner and counsel |
| Whether the requested hours and rates are reasonable | Requesting counsel represented fees and submitted billing records supporting hours and rates | Respondent raised no specific objections to billing detail or reasonableness | Special Master reviewed records, found no cause to reduce hours or rates, and approved them |
Key Cases Cited
- Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (attorney fee awards under the Vaccine Act encompass all charges and bar additional collection from the client)
