midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
494 B.R. 16
Bankr. D. Mass.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Funds are three ERISA multi-employer plans; plaintiff is their trustee and treasurer and union official.
  • Zani Tile Co., Inc., run by the Debtor, failed to pay Deductions and Contributions to the Funds after 2008.
  • Contributions are plan assets; Debtor oversaw payment, with monthly remittance reports to the Funds.
  • Delinquency occurred from late 2008, through cessation of payments in August 2010; Debtor also had personal financial dealings with Zani and third parties.
  • Judgment in district court awarded plaintiff damages for unpaid Deductions and Contributions; Debtor filed Chapter 7 in 2011.
  • On remand, the court ultimately determined Contributions were nondischargeable under § 523(a)(4) due to defalcation by a fiduciary.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether unpaid Contributions constitute defalcation under § 523(a)(4). Debtor breached fiduciary duty, causing a defalcation by prioritizing his interests over the Funds. Unpaid Contributions are a breach of contract, not defalcation or fraud. Defalcation established; nondischargeable.
Whether the Debtor acted in a fiduciary capacity with respect to the Funds. Debtor controlled funds and owed duties, constituting fiduciary function. He lacked the discretion to engage in fiduciary management under ERISA. Debtor acted as fiduciary; fiduciary status found.
What standard applies to 'defalcation' under § 523(a)(4) and is intent required. Some fault short of fraud suffices given breach of loyalty. Defalcation requires a culpable state of mind; more than mere contract breach. Defalcation requires intentional or reckless disregard; standard satisfied.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Baylis, 313 F.3d 9 (1st Cir. 2002) (defalcation includes breach of loyalty; strict fiduciary fault)
  • In re Hyman, ??? (2d Cir. 2007) (functional fiduciary analysis under defalcation)
  • Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A., 133 S. Ct. 1754 (U.S. 2013) (defalcation requires a culpable state of mind similar to intent or recklessness)
  • In re Fahey, 470 B.R. 649 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2012) ( ERISA fiduciary defalcation discussion in district bankruptcy context)
  • Raso v. Fahey (In re Fahey),, 482 B.R. 678 (1st Cir. BAP 2012) (panel remand and fiduciary defalcation analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Raso v. Fahey (In re Fahey)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Date Published: Jun 11, 2013
Citations: 494 B.R. 16; Bankruptcy No. 11-10505-WCH; Adversary No. 11-1118
Docket Number: Bankruptcy No. 11-10505-WCH; Adversary No. 11-1118
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. D. Mass.
Log In
    Raso v. Fahey (In re Fahey), 494 B.R. 16