Randon Lee Foley v. State
06-17-00037-CR
Tex. App.Apr 21, 2017Background
- Randon Lee Foley pled guilty to bail jumping and failure to appear under a plea agreement that recommended ten years’ deferred-adjudication community supervision.
- On October 14, 2011, the trial court accepted the plea and placed Foley on deferred adjudication community supervision.
- The State filed a motion to adjudicate on June 3, 2016, alleging violations of supervision conditions.
- On December 16, 2016, the trial court overruled the motion to adjudicate and instead modified Foley’s community-supervision terms and conditions.
- Foley filed a notice of appeal from the December 16, 2016 order on January 17, 2017.
- The Court of Appeals notified Foley of a potential jurisdictional defect and, receiving no response, concluded it lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether an order modifying deferred-adjudication conditions is appealable | Foley seeks appellate review of the December 16, 2016 order | State contends the modification order is not an appealable judgment under Texas law | The court held it is not appealable and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction |
Key Cases Cited
- Galitz v. State, 617 S.W.2d 949 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981) (appeals exist only as authorized by the Legislature)
- Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (criminal appeals generally from written judgments of conviction)
- Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977) (deferred-adjudication appealability context informing limitations)
- Rickels v. State, 108 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (deferred-adjudication principles limiting appeals)
- Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (holding orders modifying terms or conditions of deferred adjudication are not appealable)
