Randall Turner v. State of Tennessee
E2016-01969-CCA-R3-PC
| Tenn. Crim. App. | Jul 7, 2017Background
- In 2001 Randall Turner pled guilty to first-degree murder, aggravated kidnapping, and two counts of aggravated robbery and received an effective sentence of life without parole.
- Turner filed multiple post-conviction and habeas petitions from 2001–2014; prior petitions were dismissed as untimely or otherwise denied, and several appeals were affirmed.
- On June 1, 2016 Turner filed a “Motion to Re-Open Post-Conviction Petition,” alleging coerced guilty pleas (Eighth Amendment), ineffective assistance (trial counsel’s failure to disclose a malpractice suit), and conspiracy among counsel, the State, and the court.
- The post-conviction court treated the filing as an original post-conviction petition and denied it as untimely on June 6, 2016; Turner filed multiple motions to reconsider and then a late notice of appeal on September 27, 2016.
- The Court of Criminal Appeals concluded Turner failed to follow the statutory procedures to seek review of a denial of a motion to reopen and that his notice of appeal from the post-conviction denial was untimely; the court declined to waive the deadline and dismissed the appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether plea was compelled and sentence violated the Eighth Amendment | Turner: pleas coerced by delay/tactics of counsel, State, and court; sentence cruel | State: claims untimely and procedurally defaulted; no relief because appeal/jurisdiction defects | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction/untimely appeal; merits not reached |
| Whether Turner was effectively deprived of counsel | Turner: trial counsel failed to disclose Turner’s malpractice suit, causing conflict/ineffective assistance | State: procedural default and untimely; no jurisdiction to review | Dismissed as untimely/unreviewable on appeal |
| Constitutionality of the one-year post-conviction statute of limitations | Turner: one-year limitation is unconstitutional | State: procedural bar; court did not reach constitutional claim because of procedural defects | Claim not adjudicated; appeal dismissed for procedural reasons |
| Recusal of post-conviction judge | Turner: judge should have recused when entertaining motion to reopen | State: procedural defects; motion untimely | Court found procedural defects and declined review; recusal claim not reached |
Key Cases Cited
- Graham v. State, 90 S.W.3d 687 (Tenn. 2002) (notice of appeal may be treated as application for permission to appeal if it contains sufficient substance)
- State v. Rockwell, 280 S.W.3d 212 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007) (discussing waiver of untimely notice of appeal and factors for granting waiver)
