History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ralston v. Ralston
55 A.3d 736
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Grantors Walter Francis Ralston Sr. and Elverta Ralston owned land in Decatur Township, Clearfield County, with minerals reserved by deed.
  • The 1984 deed conveyed surface to Walter Francis Ralston Jr. but reserved minerals, ingress/egress, and a lifetime restraint during Grantors’ lifetimes.
  • The 4th paragraph’s 'null and void' clause stated rights would vest in the grantee after Grantors’ deaths, not pass through the Grantors’ estate.
  • Walter Francis Ralston Jr. conveyed the land to himself and his wife Patricia Ralston in 1991 as a Tenancy by the Entireties.
  • Walter Jr. died in 1993; Elverta Ralston died in 1996; Patricia later conveyed her rights to Bernard Ralston in 1999.
  • Appellants filed suit in 2011 to quiet title; Appellees sought a 5/7 ownership of the excepted rights; trial court granted appellees’ summary judgment and denied appellants’ summary judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the deed created an exception or a reservation Appellants contend the null and void clause shows a reservation to grantors' heirs. Appellees argue the language created an exception since rights existed and remained with grantors. Deed created an exception; null and void language cannot create forfeiture
Whether the restraint on alienation was reasonable Restraint during Grantors’ lifetimes is an unreasonable, voiding provision. Restraint limited to lifetimes is reasonable and enforceable. Restraint limited to lifetimes is reasonable; Walter’s conveyance during lifetimes violated the restraint

Key Cases Cited

  • Walker v. Forcey, 151 A.2d 606 (Pa.1959) (distinguishes reservation vs. exception where rights exist at grant)
  • Lauderbaugh v. Williams, 186 A.2d 39 (Pa.1962) (absolute restraints void; limited restraints permissible)
  • Estate of Royer v. Wineland Equip., Inc., 663 A.2d 780 (Pa.Super.1995) (restraint reasonableness measured by duration and context)
  • Hyatt v. Hyatt, 417 A.2d 726 (Pa.Super.1979) (indefinite restraint deemed unreasonable)
  • Consolidation Coal Co. v. White, 875 A.2d 318 (Pa.Super.2005) (primary tools for contractual interpretation of deeds)
  • Kripp v. Kripp, 849 A.2d 1159 (Pa.2004) (ordinary meaning given to contract terms; interpret words)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Ralston v. Ralston
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 24, 2012
Citation: 55 A.3d 736
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.