Rabo Agrifinance, Inc. v. Rock Creek Farms
2012 S.D. 20
| S.D. | 2012Background
- Rabo filed a 2009 foreclosure action on Finnemans’ 17,000 acres, naming Finnemans, Rock Creek Farms (successor in interest), and numerous lienholders including the United States.
- A sheriff’s sale occurred in April 2010, with redemption rights later at issue for Rock Creek Farms.
- Ann Arnoldy redeemed in March 2011 from an assignee of the purchaser of the sheriff’s certificate.
- In May 2011, the trial court partially vacated the judgment and decree of foreclosure regarding RCF’s redemption rights, conditioning on the United States’ $1,000,000 conviction lien being satisfied after Arnoldys receive a deed.
- Finnemans' and Rock Creek Farms separately filed notices of appeal in July 2011 from the partial vacatur order.
- The United States and Arnoldys moved to dismiss for failure to serve notices of appeal on all parties; the motions were consolidated and stayed pending decision.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Finnemans’ and RCF’s appeals must be dismissed for failure to serve notices on all parties. | Finnemans and RCF contend service on all parties is not required. | United States and others argue service on every party is mandatory and jurisdictional. | Yes; appeals dismissed for failure to serve notices on each party. |
Key Cases Cited
- Reese Trust, 776 N.W.2d 832 (2009 S.D.) (jurisdictional service required for each party)
- In re B.C., 786 N.W.2d 350 (2010 S.D.) (service on all parties required; jurisdictional)
- Morrell, 86 N.W.2d 533 (1957 S.D.) (failure to serve adverse party fatal to appeal)
- In re Estate of Geier, N.W.2d (2012 S.D.) (identify parties; service required when status as party is clear)
- Ex rel. DSS, 799 N.W.2d 408 (2011 S.D.) (only timely filing cannot be the sole unwaivable requirement; service still matters)
