midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
407 P.3d 1084
Utah Ct. App.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Police responded to a neighbor report of a loud family argument; 16-year-old K.B. answered the door bleeding and reported Mother slapped and pushed her. Officer arrested Mother for child abuse and released the children to Father.
  • DCFS filed a petition seeking protective supervision of the three minor children, citing supported findings that Mother (and earlier Father) committed physical abuse of K.B.; the petition alleged all children were abused or neglected.
  • Family history: parents divorced in 2010, shared joint custody with alternating two-week parenting time; relationship is high-conflict, including a protective order and prior custodial-interference charges against Mother.
  • Trial evidence: K.B. and older sibling T.B. testified about heated, sometimes physical, parental conflicts; T.B. moved to Father’s home before turning 18 alleging she felt unsafe with Mother. Grandfather testified B.B. and L.B. cried hysterically when removed to Father after Mother’s arrest.
  • Juvenile court found Mother physically abused K.B., and further found Mother’s “apparent hate and disgust of Father” and custodial interference caused all children significant emotional abuse and neglect; court awarded DCFS protective supervision.
  • On appeal, court affirmed the physical-abuse finding as to K.B., reversed the emotional-abuse finding (insufficient evidence of serious emotional harm), affirmed neglect findings as to B.B. and L.B. (they lived with an abused child), reversed the finding that K.B. was neglected, and held the juvenile court could not substantiate DCFS’s non-severe supported findings under Utah Code §78A-6-323 when the allegations were non-severe.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Mother) Defendant's Argument (State/DCFS) Held
Whether Mother’s "hate and disgust" of Father and denial of parenting time caused emotional abuse to the children Insufficient evidence that Mother’s animus or custodial interference produced "emotional damage" amounting to serious impairment The family conflict and custodial interference harmed children’s emotional well-being supporting protective supervision Reversed: insufficient evidence of emotional abuse (no proof of serious impairment)
Whether all three children were neglected Mother: finding of neglect is circular and insufficient as to K.B. State: K.B.’s abuse supports neglect risk for siblings living in same household Affirmed as to B.B. and L.B. (they were at risk by statute); reversed as to K.B. (an abused child alone is not automatically "neglected")
Whether the juvenile court could substantiate DCFS’s supported findings of non-severe physical abuse under §78A-6-323 Statute does not permit court to substantiate prior non-severe agency findings when the adjudicated allegation is non-severe State initially relied on DCFS supported findings to bolster petition Court ruled juvenile court erred to the extent it relied on substantiating non-severe DCFS findings; on remand court must consider only the evidence presented at trial
Whether there was sufficient evidence that Mother physically abused K.B. Mother disputed facts and context Police and K.B.’s testimony described a slap and push; prior determinations supported abuse finding Physical-abuse finding as to K.B. was previously affirmed and stands

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Van Huizen, 392 P.3d 933 (Utah Ct. App.) (appellate review of juvenile findings recited in light most favorable to juvenile court)
  • In re S.O., 122 P.3d 686 (Utah Ct. App.) (standard of review for juvenile court factual findings)
  • In re L.P., 981 P.2d 848 (Utah Ct. App.) (deference to juvenile court factfinding)
  • J.J.W. v. State, 33 P.3d 59 (Utah Ct. App.) (statutory interpretation reviewed for correctness)
  • In re J.R., 257 P.3d 1043 (Utah Ct. App.) (emotional abuse requires proof of direct harm, e.g., self-harm from sustained degradation)
  • In re A.C., 330 P.3d 725 (Utah Ct. App.) (siblings may be "at risk" when other children in household are the subject of child-welfare proceedings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: R.B. v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: Nov 16, 2017
Citations: 407 P.3d 1084; 2017 Utah App. LEXIS 218; 2017 UT App 210; 20160677-CA
Docket Number: 20160677-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.
Log In