History
  • No items yet
midpage
2017 Ohio 4404
Ohio Ct. App.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • R&A Lawn Care (Gottula) performed landscaping at property owned by Tim Back/Back Tree & Landscape under an alleged oral agreement.
  • Both parties testified there was an oral agreement at $25/hour; they had dealt under that rate in prior years.
  • R&A submitted time records for work in 2013–2014 and billed a total demand of $6,333.55 (after crediting some prior payments).
  • Defendants paid intermittently (a $1,000 check and $400 cash in 2014 were credited) and disputed additional charges, claiming some workers were non‑professional and disputing hours and invoices.
  • Debt‑collection letter prompted defendants to deny any contract and assert invoices had been paid; R&A sued for breach, payment on account, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment.
  • The municipal court found no oral contract and awarded R&A only $1,800; the court of appeals reversed, holding an oral contract existed and remanding to determine modification, breach, and damages.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Existence of an oral contract An oral agreement existed for $25/hr; course of conduct and admissions prove contract No enforceable oral contract; invoices not agreed to and services disputed Court found uncontested evidence (testimony and prior payments) established an oral contract at $25/hr; trial court erred in finding none
Proof of the sum owed R&A presented time sheets and employee testimony documenting hours billed Back disputed hours, claimed he never saw timesheets or invoices and paid for productive work; alleged rate applied only to professional workers Remanded: because an oral contract exists, trial court must reassess whether R&A proved the amount owed and any modifications to terms
Value of unpaid work / damages R&A sought $6,333.55 (less credited payments) based on records Back argued $1,800 settlement offer covered owed amount and disputed additional charges Court reversed the $1,800 award and remanded to determine if contract was modified, breached, and correct damages amount

Key Cases Cited

  • Kostelnik v. Helper, 96 Ohio St.3d 1 (Ohio 2002) (elements of a contract and that terms of an oral contract may be shown by words, acts, and course of conduct)
  • Zelina v. Hillyer, 165 Ohio App.3d 255 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005) (existence of a contract is a question of law)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: R & A Lawn Care, L.L.C. v. Back
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 21, 2017
Citations: 2017 Ohio 4404; C-160682
Docket Number: C-160682
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    R & A Lawn Care, L.L.C. v. Back, 2017 Ohio 4404