midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
450 B.R. 699
Bankr. E.D. Mich.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Quiroz owned Industrial Waste Cleanup, Inc.; the company ceased operations in 2006.
  • Michigan assessed Quiroz personally as corporate officer for failing to remit SBT for 2005 and 2006, totaling about $25,450.
  • Quiroz and spouse filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy on January 8, 2008, resulting in a discharge on April 17, 2008; it was a no asset case.
  • After discharge, the Department of Treasury pursued collection; Quiroz filed an adversary proceeding to determine dischargeability of the debt.
  • Treasury moved to dismiss; a hearing was held on April 4, 2011, with the court taking the matter under advisement.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether SBT is an excise tax entitled to priority under § 507(a)(8)(E). Quiroz argues SBT is not a transaction-based excise tax or priority. Treasury contends SBT is an excise tax on a transaction and qualifies for priority. SBT is an excise tax on a transaction; it has priority under § 507(a)(8)(E).
Whether SBT is a tax on a transaction for Quiroz personally. SBT as to Quiroz lacks 'for which the debtor is liable' language; argues personal liability doesn’t make it a transaction tax for him. Tax liability can extend to corporate officers; personal liability does not remove transaction-character or priority. SBT constitutes an excise tax as to Quiroz individually; personal liability does not defeat the transaction-based nature.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Groetken, 843 F.2d 1007 (7th Cir. 1988) (broad definition of 'transaction' in excise tax context)
  • Nat'l Steel Corp., 321 B.R. 901 (Bankr.N.D. Ill. 2005) (franchise tax as excise tax on transactions)
  • Albion Health Servs., 339 B.R. 171 (Bankr.W.D. Mich. 2006) (rejects narrow 'transaction' interpretation)
  • Trinova Corp. v. Dep't of Treasury, 433 Mich. 141, 445 N.W.2d 428 (Mich. 1989) (SBT described as value-added tax; excise on privilege of business)
  • Midwest Bus. Corp. v. Dep't of Treasury, 288 Mich.App. 334, 793 N.W.2d 246 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010) (tax base computation for SBT as economic size contribution)
  • In re DeRoche, 287 F.3d 751 (9th Cir. 2002) (broad notion of transaction in excise tax context)
  • In re Nat'l Steel Corp., 321 B.R. 901 (Bankr.N.D. Ill. 2005) (Texas franchise tax as tax on transactions)
  • In re McAdam, 402 B.R. 473 (Bankr. D. N. H. 2009) (priority for personal liabilities under § 507(a)(8))
  • Mueller v. State of Wisconsin, 243 B.R. 346 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1999) (unemployment premiums priority under § 507(a)(8))
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Quiroz v. Michigan (In Re Quiroz)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Date Published: Jun 7, 2011
Citations: 450 B.R. 699; 2011 WL 2222285; 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 2072; 18-55994
Docket Number: 18-55994
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. E.D. Mich.
Log In