Pyers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
16-421
| Fed. Cl. | Nov 2, 2016Background
- Meredith Pyers filed a Vaccine Act petition alleging left shoulder pain from a flu vaccine administered on November 23, 2014.
- On August 3, 2016, Chief Special Master Dorsey awarded compensation to Pyers based on respondent’s proffer.
- On August 16, 2016, Pyers moved for attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $14,739.96 (fees $14,049.50; costs $690.46) and stated petitioner paid no out-of-pocket expenses.
- Respondent filed a response acknowledging she had no formal role in fee resolution but agreed statutory requirements were met and suggested a reasonable award between $12,000 and $13,000.
- Petitioner filed a reply and requested an additional $275 for one hour preparing the reply; the special master found this request reasonable.
- The special master reviewed billing records, found the overall request reasonable, awarded fees and costs, and ordered payment jointly to petitioner and counsel.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met | Pyers: statutory entitlement to reasonable fees and costs after compensation was awarded | HHS: agrees requirements are met; notes respondent has no formal role in fee determination | Granted — statutory requirements met and fees/costs award appropriate |
| Whether the requested fees and hours are reasonable | Pyers: submitted billing records and prior awards showing reasonableness; sought $14,049.50 in fees | HHS: did not identify specific billing deficiencies but suggested a generally lower range ($12,000–$13,000) based on similar cases | Granted — special master reviewed records and found no cause to reduce hours or rates |
| Role of respondent in fee resolution | Pyers: proceeded with fee application for court resolution | HHS: asserted Vaccine Act and Rule 13 do not contemplate a role for respondent in fee resolution but offered views on reasonableness | Court treated respondent’s comments as nonbinding; proceeded to independently assess reasonableness |
| Fee for time preparing reply | Pyers: requested an additional $275 for one hour drafting the reply | HHS: did not object to specific addition | Granted — special master found the additional hour reasonable and awarded $275 |
Key Cases Cited
- Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (attorney may not charge or collect fees in addition to amount awarded under § 15(e))
