History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pyers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
16-421
| Fed. Cl. | Nov 2, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Meredith Pyers filed a Vaccine Act petition alleging left shoulder pain from a flu vaccine administered on November 23, 2014.
  • On August 3, 2016, Chief Special Master Dorsey awarded compensation to Pyers based on respondent’s proffer.
  • On August 16, 2016, Pyers moved for attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $14,739.96 (fees $14,049.50; costs $690.46) and stated petitioner paid no out-of-pocket expenses.
  • Respondent filed a response acknowledging she had no formal role in fee resolution but agreed statutory requirements were met and suggested a reasonable award between $12,000 and $13,000.
  • Petitioner filed a reply and requested an additional $275 for one hour preparing the reply; the special master found this request reasonable.
  • The special master reviewed billing records, found the overall request reasonable, awarded fees and costs, and ordered payment jointly to petitioner and counsel.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met Pyers: statutory entitlement to reasonable fees and costs after compensation was awarded HHS: agrees requirements are met; notes respondent has no formal role in fee determination Granted — statutory requirements met and fees/costs award appropriate
Whether the requested fees and hours are reasonable Pyers: submitted billing records and prior awards showing reasonableness; sought $14,049.50 in fees HHS: did not identify specific billing deficiencies but suggested a generally lower range ($12,000–$13,000) based on similar cases Granted — special master reviewed records and found no cause to reduce hours or rates
Role of respondent in fee resolution Pyers: proceeded with fee application for court resolution HHS: asserted Vaccine Act and Rule 13 do not contemplate a role for respondent in fee resolution but offered views on reasonableness Court treated respondent’s comments as nonbinding; proceeded to independently assess reasonableness
Fee for time preparing reply Pyers: requested an additional $275 for one hour drafting the reply HHS: did not object to specific addition Granted — special master found the additional hour reasonable and awarded $275

Key Cases Cited

  • Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (attorney may not charge or collect fees in addition to amount awarded under § 15(e))
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Pyers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: Nov 2, 2016
Docket Number: 16-421
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.