Pulley v. State
291 Ga. 330
| Ga. | 2012Background
- Pulley was convicted after a jury trial of malice murder, theft by taking a motor vehicle, and felony theft by taking; he received life for malice murder and consecutive ten-year terms for the thefts.
- On April 9, 2008, Pulley allegedly killed Darryl Mason during an altercation, beating him with a television and discarding the victim’s property, then placing stolen items in Mason’s car.
- Pulley fled with the victim’s stolen goods, including two PlayStation 2 consoles, DVDs, movies, video games, jewelry, and watches; police later recovered DVDs with blood in the car.
- Pulley admitted during police interviews to taking the stolen items and claimed Mason attacked him with scissors; the medical examiner attributed Mason’s death to a fatal blow to the head with blunt trauma.
- Pulley challenged the felony theft by taking conviction on the basis that the value of stolen items did not exceed $500; the record included testimony valuing the consoles at about $150 each and DVDs totaling $175, with other goods referenced as well.
- Appellant appealed, and the court affirmed, addressing issues of voluntariness of statements, jury instructions on mutual combat and voluntary manslaughter, and other trial rulings.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of value for felony theft by taking | Pulley argues value did not exceed $500 | State contends value shown by evidence supports felony theft | Sufficient evidence supports value finding and felony theft conviction |
| Voluntariness of inculpatory statements | Statements induced by promise of benefit | Totality of circumstances shows voluntariness despite promises | Statements were voluntary under the totality of circumstances |
| Mutual combat and voluntary manslaughter charges | Trial court erred by not charging mutual combat and voluntary manslaughter | No evidence to support mutual combat; no basis for voluntary manslaughter | No error; no charge on mutual combat or voluntary manslaughter warranted |
| Provocation for voluntary manslaughter and self-defense juxtaposition | Evidence supported voluntary manslaughter due to provocation | No adequate provocation; self-defense charge correct | Trial court properly refused voluntary manslaughter based on provocation; self-defense charge allowed |
| Character evidence based on clean record | Request for character charge warranted by discussion of clean record | Clean record alone insufficient for good-character instruction | No error; absence of prior convictions does not automatically warrant character instruction |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. Supreme Court 1979) (sufficiency review standard for criminal convictions)
- Partin v. State, 302 Ga. App. 589 (Ga. App. 2010) (measures value for theft by taking; market value evidence admissibility)
- Williams v. State, 246 Ga. App. 347 (Ga. App. 2000) (weight of opinion evidence for market value)
