History
  • No items yet
midpage
Providence Health Plan v. Winchester
252 Or. App. 283
| Or. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Providence Health Plan sues Winchester to recover medical expenses Providence paid for Winchester’s injuries from a pedestrian automobile accident.
  • The driver’s liability policy and Winchester’s own UIM and PIP policies are involved; Providence seeks reimbursement from settlements received by Winchester.
  • Providence asserted a Subrogation Trust Agreement and a Third Party Liability/Subrogation provision in its employer group contract as the basis for recovery.
  • Winchester settled with State Farm for policy limits: driver’s policy $25,000, UIM $75,000, PIP $15,000, totaling $115,000; Providence had paid $86,417.25 in medical expenses.
  • The trial court granted Providence summary judgment; Winchester appealed, arguing the contract provision is superseded by ORS 742.534–742.538 and prerequisites of ORS 742.538 were not met.
  • The court reversed, holding that ORS 742.538 prerequisites were not satisfied because interinsurer reimbursement under ORS 742.534 was available when Providence asserted its right to subrogation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether ORS 742.538 preempts Providence's contract provision Providence argues contract rights supplement, not conflict with ORS 742.538. Providence’s contract is superseded by ORS 742.538 because it conflicts with statutory prerequisites. ORS 742.538 preempts contract where applicable.
Whether ORS 742.534 was available to Providence when it asserted subrogation Interinsurer reimbursement under ORS 742.534 was not available once payor reached policy limits. 742.534 remained available; Providence could not proceed under 742.538. 742.534 was available; Providence could not pursue 742.538.
Whether Providence satisfied ORS 742.538 prerequisites Providence satisfies prereqs by showing non-availability of 742.534 and entitlement under policy. Because 742.534 was available, and Providence hadn’t elected lien under 742.536, 742.538 prereqs were not met. Prerequisites not met; recovery under 742.538 denied.

Key Cases Cited

  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hale, 215 Or App 19 (2007) (adopts ORS 742.538 subrogation framework and availability analysis)
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Sommerholder, 65 Or App 449 (1983) (explains ORS 742.534 interinsurer reimbursement framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Providence Health Plan v. Winchester
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Sep 12, 2012
Citation: 252 Or. App. 283
Docket Number: CV080258; A142272
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.